RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BACK ASYMMETRY AND SELF-PERCEIVED BODY IMAGE IN ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS

Background: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) can significantly impact self-perceived body image, with visual deformity and psychosocial factors not always aligning with radiographic severity, necessitating further understanding of external asymmetries.Purpose: To examine the association between back asymmetry of both frontal and axial planes and self-perceived body image in adolescents with AIS.Materials and Methods: Forty-one participants with thoracic-dominant AIS (11–18 years; Cobb angle 25°–45°) were recruited from outpatient clinics and the faculty of Physical Therapy at Cairo University. Frontal and axial back asymmetries were assessed using the BACKSCNR mobile application. Self-perceived body image was assessed with trunk appearance perception scale . Spearman correlations were used to test the associations between asymmetry metrics and TAPS (α = 0.05). Results: The mean of self-perceived body image was 3.37 ± 0.54. Mean of frontal asymmetry was −25.20 ± 7.14 and axial rotation 27.42 ± 7.52 (BackSCNR mm). Neither frontal nor axial asymmetry correlated with self-perceived body image (ρ = -0.030, p = 0.853, ρ = 0.151, p = 0.474).Conclusions: In adolescents with moderate thoracic AIS (25°–45°), externally measured frontal and axial back asymmetries did not relate to self-perceived body image on TAPS. These findings suggest that body-image dissatisfaction in AIS reflects a complex interplay of physical and psychosocial factors rather than surface or radiographic deformity alone. Non-invasive surface-topography tools remain valuable for monitoring posture and treatment response but should be complemented with patient-reported outcomes when addressing body-image concerns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Egyptian Journal of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/ejptr.2025.432583.1062
Primary Topic
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BACK ASYMMETRY AND SELF-PERCEIVED BODY IMAGE IN ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS

Sara Adel Abdelrahman Zaki, Muhammad Aziz, Salwa Fadl Abd-ElMageed
Egyptian Journal of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
article

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BACK ASYMMETRY AND SELF-PERCEIVED BODY IMAGE IN ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS

Sara Adel Abdelrahman Zaki, Muhammad Aziz, Salwa Fadl Abd-ElMageed
article en

Abstract

Background: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) can significantly impact self-perceived body image, with visual deformity and psychosocial factors not always aligning with radiographic severity, necessitating further understanding of external asymmetries.Purpose: To examine the association between back asymmetry of both frontal and axial planes and self-perceived body image in adolescents with AIS.Materials and Methods: Forty-one participants with thoracic-dominant AIS (11–18 years; Cobb angle 25°–45°) were recruited from outpatient clinics and the faculty of Physical Therapy at Cairo University. Frontal and axial back asymmetries were assessed using the BACKSCNR mobile application. Self-perceived body image was assessed with trunk appearance perception scale . Spearman correlations were used to test the associations between asymmetry metrics and TAPS (α = 0.05). Results: The mean of self-perceived body image was 3.37 ± 0.54. Mean of frontal asymmetry was −25.20 ± 7.14 and axial rotation 27.42 ± 7.52 (BackSCNR mm). Neither frontal nor axial asymmetry correlated with self-perceived body image (ρ = -0.030, p = 0.853, ρ = 0.151, p = 0.474).Conclusions: In adolescents with moderate thoracic AIS (25°–45°), externally measured frontal and axial back asymmetries did not relate to self-perceived body image on TAPS. These findings suggest that body-image dissatisfaction in AIS reflects a complex interplay of physical and psychosocial factors rather than surface or radiographic deformity alone. Non-invasive surface-topography tools remain valuable for monitoring posture and treatment response but should be complemented with patient-reported outcomes when addressing body-image concerns.

Egyptian Journal of Physical Therapy and RehabilitationVol. 0(0)
Cairo University (EG), Egyptian Museum (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.