Factors Influencing the Stocking of Juvenile Pikeperch ( <i>Sander lucioperca</i> )

ABSTRACT Predator species of fish play crucial roles in ecosystem balance through top‐down control, a mechanism frequently exploited in biomanipulation to stock predator species. Juvenile pikeperch ( Sander lucioperca ) were stocked ( n = 52,887) in spring 2023 and 2024 and autumn 2023 to compare stocking efficiency between Recirculation Aquaculture Systems (RAS) and pond culture systems. Post‐stocking mortality was high and differed among rearing methods and stocking seasons (pond‐reared: 93.3% in spring 2023, 100% in autumn 2023, and 98.9% in spring 2024; RAS‐reared: 100% in spring 2023, 99.5% in autumn 2023, and 99.1% in spring 2024). Recapture rates of pond‐reared pikeperch stocked in spring 2023 were highest, despite being smaller than corresponding RAS‐reared pikeperch when stocked. Recapture rates of autumn‐stocked pikeperch were low for both rearing methods in the single release of 2023. Pond‐reared pikeperch were smaller when stocked (91.56 mm in spring 2023; 69.26 mm in spring 2024) but grew faster and often reached a similar size as RAS‐reared fish that were larger when stocked (139.40 mm in spring 2023; 162.80 mm in spring 2024). When recaptured in spring 2023, both groups reached a similar size (~183 mm; at recapture in spring 2024 they had nearly similar sizes pond: 169 mm, RAS: 197.25 mm). Overall, survival of pond‐reared pikeperch was significantly higher than RAS‐reared fish, even after accounting for size at stocking and season. Rearing system, rather than initial size alone, strongly influenced post‐stocking success. High density of adult European perch ( Perca fluviatilis ) preyed heavily on juvenile pikeperch, thereby limiting natural recruitment. For pond‐reared pikeperch, size was crucial due to limited energy reserves for overwintering, whereas RAS‐reared pikeperch were challenged by a delayed shift to natural prey, poor shelter‐seeking behavior, and predator naïveté. Overall, we found that stocking success depended on factors beyond size at stocking, and high mortality prevented stocking alone from achieving desired ecosystem management goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fisheries Management and Ecology
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/fme.70032
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors Influencing the Stocking of Juvenile Pikeperch ( Sander lucioperca )

Vladislav Draštík, Jaroslava Frouzová, Michaela Holubová, Martin Čech et al.
1 citations
Fisheries Management and Ecology
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
2.31
article

Factors Influencing the Stocking of Juvenile Pikeperch ( Sander lucioperca )

Vladislav Draštík, Jaroslava Frouzová, Michaela Holubová, Martin Čech, Milan Muška, Rubén Rabaneda‐Bueno, Marie Prchalová, Pavel Rychtecký, Václav Kučera, Milan Říha, Oleksandr Malinovskyi, Petr Blabolil, Zuzana Sajdlová, Jan Kubečka, Mojmír Vašek, Tomáš Jůza, Luboš Kočvara, Michal Tušer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Predator species of fish play crucial roles in ecosystem balance through top‐down control, a mechanism frequently exploited in biomanipulation to stock predator species. Juvenile pikeperch ( Sander lucioperca ) were stocked ( n = 52,887) in spring 2023 and 2024 and autumn 2023 to compare stocking efficiency between Recirculation Aquaculture Systems (RAS) and pond culture systems. Post‐stocking mortality was high and differed among rearing methods and stocking seasons (pond‐reared: 93.3% in spring 2023, 100% in autumn 2023, and 98.9% in spring 2024; RAS‐reared: 100% in spring 2023, 99.5% in autumn 2023, and 99.1% in spring 2024). Recapture rates of pond‐reared pikeperch stocked in spring 2023 were highest, despite being smaller than corresponding RAS‐reared pikeperch when stocked. Recapture rates of autumn‐stocked pikeperch were low for both rearing methods in the single release of 2023. Pond‐reared pikeperch were smaller when stocked (91.56 mm in spring 2023; 69.26 mm in spring 2024) but grew faster and often reached a similar size as RAS‐reared fish that were larger when stocked (139.40 mm in spring 2023; 162.80 mm in spring 2024). When recaptured in spring 2023, both groups reached a similar size (~183 mm; at recapture in spring 2024 they had nearly similar sizes pond: 169 mm, RAS: 197.25 mm). Overall, survival of pond‐reared pikeperch was significantly higher than RAS‐reared fish, even after accounting for size at stocking and season. Rearing system, rather than initial size alone, strongly influenced post‐stocking success. High density of adult European perch ( Perca fluviatilis ) preyed heavily on juvenile pikeperch, thereby limiting natural recruitment. For pond‐reared pikeperch, size was crucial due to limited energy reserves for overwintering, whereas RAS‐reared pikeperch were challenged by a delayed shift to natural prey, poor shelter‐seeking behavior, and predator naïveté. Overall, we found that stocking success depended on factors beyond size at stocking, and high mortality prevented stocking alone from achieving desired ecosystem management goals.

Fisheries Management and Ecology
Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ), University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice (CZ), Institute of Hydrobiology, Biology Centre, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (CZ), South Bohemia research center of aquaculture and biodiversity of hydrocenoses (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.