War and protoecological views in Walter Scott’s novels

Until recently, Walter Scott’s work coursed mostly under the radar of ecocritical criticism. Scott’s poetry was influenced at the beginning of his career by his own translations of German poetry and especially of Goethe, who has been associated with a protoecological view on nature, his works detailing “the material interactions of living and non-living things” (Sullivan 18), features which pertain to what Timothy Morton defined as a ‘mesh’ of agential processes. While Scott’s own poems may be taken into account by ecocriticism, his ‘historical’ novel is laden with so much about former conflicts, political and economic forces that it seems to be very wide off the ecological mark. Yet, his human-nature engagements evince a complex interdependence which might be rewarding in an ecocritical reading. Scott’s novels reveal an ecological thought in which intrasubjectivity and intersubjectivity are important and are part of a fictional network of interdependencies, which contains more than the ramifications of a reduced ‘mesh’, understood simply in terms of material codependency and coexistence. There is no abrupt nature-culture separation in his work, as his views are shaped by his Scottish Enlightenment/Romanticism heritage. Irony and humour are an integral part of his protoecological vision, emphasizing the moral responsibility humans have as humble stewards of the earth.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
University of Bucharest Review Literary and Cultural Studies Series
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31178/ubr.15.2.7
Primary Topic
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

War and protoecological views in Walter Scott’s novels

CRISTIAN ŞTEFAN VÎJEA
University of Bucharest Review Literary and Cultural Studies Series
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
article

War and protoecological views in Walter Scott’s novels

CRISTIAN ŞTEFAN VÎJEA
article en

Abstract

Until recently, Walter Scott’s work coursed mostly under the radar of ecocritical criticism. Scott’s poetry was influenced at the beginning of his career by his own translations of German poetry and especially of Goethe, who has been associated with a protoecological view on nature, his works detailing “the material interactions of living and non-living things” (Sullivan 18), features which pertain to what Timothy Morton defined as a ‘mesh’ of agential processes. While Scott’s own poems may be taken into account by ecocriticism, his ‘historical’ novel is laden with so much about former conflicts, political and economic forces that it seems to be very wide off the ecological mark. Yet, his human-nature engagements evince a complex interdependence which might be rewarding in an ecocritical reading. Scott’s novels reveal an ecological thought in which intrasubjectivity and intersubjectivity are important and are part of a fictional network of interdependencies, which contains more than the ramifications of a reduced ‘mesh’, understood simply in terms of material codependency and coexistence. There is no abrupt nature-culture separation in his work, as his views are shaped by his Scottish Enlightenment/Romanticism heritage. Irony and humour are an integral part of his protoecological vision, emphasizing the moral responsibility humans have as humble stewards of the earth.

University of Bucharest Review Literary and Cultural Studies SeriesVol. 15(2/2024)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.