Enhancing SUHI monitoring in mountainous cities: A comparative study of Chongqing and Chengdu, China

Accurately defining rural reference areas is a key challenge in monitoring the surface urban heat island (SUHI). This challenge is especially pronounced in mountainous cities with complex terrains, where factors such as urban-rural elevation differences, scattered rural settlements, and pixel scale significantly affect SUHI evaluation. Based on the traditional buffer method (TBM), this study proposes a multi-factor decision method (MFD) for defining rural reference areas in SUHI monitoring for mountainous cities. The MFD integrates digital elevation model (DEM), nighttime light (NTL), ‌land use and land cover change (LUCC), and Landsat normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data. The applicability of the MFD algorithm was evaluated by comparing its performance with that of the TBM in a mountainous city (Chongqing metropolitan circle) and a plain city (Chengdu). The results show that, as the buffer scale increases from 5 km to 25 km, the mean land surface temperature (LST) of rural reference pixels extracted using the TBM algorithm ( LST t ) decreases by 1.6 K in Chengdu and by 1.9 K in Chongqing metropolitan circle, whereas the LST extracted using the MFD algorithm ( LST m ) decreases by only 0.4 K in Chengdu and 0.6 K in Chongqing metropolitan circle. The changes in LST m are consistently smaller than those of LST t in both study area. These findings indicate that the MFD algorithm provides more stable rural reference areas for SUHI estimation than the TBM algorithm and is more suitable for SUHI monitoring in mountainous cities. SUHI monitoring results reveal that SUHI t (SUHI estimated using TBM) includes some “false heat island” pixels, and its range and intensity increase significantly with buffer scale, whereas the range and intensity of SUHI m (SUHI estimated using MFD) show minimal variation. Additionally, the R-values between SUHI m and socioeconomic factors are consistently higher than those of SUHI t . These findings demonstrate that the MFD algorithm, incorporating multiple factors, provides higher accuracy in SUHI monitoring for mountainous cities compared to the TBM algorithm. • Enhancing the quantification of surface urban heat island in mountainous cities. • Developing a multi-factor decision method (MFD) for defining rural reference areas in SUHI monitoring for mountainous cities. • The MFD algorithm significantly decreases pseudo-thermal island artifacts in SUHI monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Climate
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2025.102656
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Urban Heat Island Mitigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing SUHI monitoring in mountainous cities: A comparative study of Chongqing and Chengdu, China

Wan‐Huan Zhou, Shiqi Yang, Dejun Zhang, Yuyu Zhou et al.
1 citations
Urban Climate
Urban Heat Island Mitigation
0.80
article

Enhancing SUHI monitoring in mountainous cities: A comparative study of Chongqing and Chengdu, China

Wan‐Huan Zhou, Shiqi Yang, Dejun Zhang, Yuyu Zhou, Zeneng He, Hao Zhu, Qinyu Ye
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Accurately defining rural reference areas is a key challenge in monitoring the surface urban heat island (SUHI). This challenge is especially pronounced in mountainous cities with complex terrains, where factors such as urban-rural elevation differences, scattered rural settlements, and pixel scale significantly affect SUHI evaluation. Based on the traditional buffer method (TBM), this study proposes a multi-factor decision method (MFD) for defining rural reference areas in SUHI monitoring for mountainous cities. The MFD integrates digital elevation model (DEM), nighttime light (NTL), ‌land use and land cover change (LUCC), and Landsat normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data. The applicability of the MFD algorithm was evaluated by comparing its performance with that of the TBM in a mountainous city (Chongqing metropolitan circle) and a plain city (Chengdu). The results show that, as the buffer scale increases from 5 km to 25 km, the mean land surface temperature (LST) of rural reference pixels extracted using the TBM algorithm ( LST t ) decreases by 1.6 K in Chengdu and by 1.9 K in Chongqing metropolitan circle, whereas the LST extracted using the MFD algorithm ( LST m ) decreases by only 0.4 K in Chengdu and 0.6 K in Chongqing metropolitan circle. The changes in LST m are consistently smaller than those of LST t in both study area. These findings indicate that the MFD algorithm provides more stable rural reference areas for SUHI estimation than the TBM algorithm and is more suitable for SUHI monitoring in mountainous cities. SUHI monitoring results reveal that SUHI t (SUHI estimated using TBM) includes some “false heat island” pixels, and its range and intensity increase significantly with buffer scale, whereas the range and intensity of SUHI m (SUHI estimated using MFD) show minimal variation. Additionally, the R-values between SUHI m and socioeconomic factors are consistently higher than those of SUHI t . These findings demonstrate that the MFD algorithm, incorporating multiple factors, provides higher accuracy in SUHI monitoring for mountainous cities compared to the TBM algorithm. • Enhancing the quantification of surface urban heat island in mountainous cities. • Developing a multi-factor decision method (MFD) for defining rural reference areas in SUHI monitoring for mountainous cities. • The MFD algorithm significantly decreases pseudo-thermal island artifacts in SUHI monitoring.

Urban ClimateVol. 64
Hong Kong Baptist University (HK), Education University of Hong Kong (HK), Jiangsu Institute of Meteorological Sciences (CN), State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science (CN), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Urban Heat Island Mitigation
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.