Data-Driven Optimal Treatment Combination Regimes for Multiple Stressors Controlling for Multiple Adverse Effects

Combination drug treatment plays a central role in addressing complex diseases by enhancing the therapeutic benefit while mitigating adverse effects. However, determining optimal dose levels remains challenging due to additive drug effects, competing safety constraints, and the scarcity of reliable data in clinical and experimental settings. This paper develops a data-driven robust optimization framework for combination dose selection under uncertainty. The proposed approach integrates posterior sampling via Markov Chain Monte Carlo with convex hull-based and mean-based filtration methods to generate, evaluate, and refine candidate optimal solutions. By embedding uncertainty quantification into the optimization process, the framework systematically balances therapeutic efficacy against the risk of adverse effects, yielding risk-averse yet effective dose strategies. Numerical experiments using exponential dose–response models and the ED50 criterion demonstrate that convex hull-based methods consistently produce feasible solutions, while mean-based approaches are prone to infeasibility except in limited cases. Among hull methods, balance-oriented filtration (BOF) achieves the best balance between performance and conservativeness, closely approximating the benchmark solution under moderate levels of uncertainty for models with additive drug effects. These findings highlight the advantages of robust optimization for dose selection in settings where data are limited, variability is high, and risk management is essential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematics
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/math13213542
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data-Driven Optimal Treatment Combination Regimes for Multiple Stressors Controlling for Multiple Adverse Effects

Edward L. Boone, Ryad Ghanam, Kiran Shrestha
Mathematics
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
article

Data-Driven Optimal Treatment Combination Regimes for Multiple Stressors Controlling for Multiple Adverse Effects

Edward L. Boone, Ryad Ghanam, Kiran Shrestha
article en

Abstract

Combination drug treatment plays a central role in addressing complex diseases by enhancing the therapeutic benefit while mitigating adverse effects. However, determining optimal dose levels remains challenging due to additive drug effects, competing safety constraints, and the scarcity of reliable data in clinical and experimental settings. This paper develops a data-driven robust optimization framework for combination dose selection under uncertainty. The proposed approach integrates posterior sampling via Markov Chain Monte Carlo with convex hull-based and mean-based filtration methods to generate, evaluate, and refine candidate optimal solutions. By embedding uncertainty quantification into the optimization process, the framework systematically balances therapeutic efficacy against the risk of adverse effects, yielding risk-averse yet effective dose strategies. Numerical experiments using exponential dose–response models and the ED50 criterion demonstrate that convex hull-based methods consistently produce feasible solutions, while mean-based approaches are prone to infeasibility except in limited cases. Among hull methods, balance-oriented filtration (BOF) achieves the best balance between performance and conservativeness, closely approximating the benchmark solution under moderate levels of uncertainty for models with additive drug effects. These findings highlight the advantages of robust optimization for dose selection in settings where data are limited, variability is high, and risk management is essential.

MathematicsVol. 13(21)
Virginia Commonwealth University (US), VCUQatar (QA)
Qatar Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.