The Business Cycle’s Impact on Volatility Forecasting: Recapturing Intrinsic Jump Components

This study investigates the leverage effect and realized volatility (RV) of stocks in the presence of asymmetric jumps across economic expansions and contractions. We extend the heterogeneous autoregressive-realized volatility (HAR-RV) model by incorporating a two-period Markov regime-switching model to capture Taiwan’s economic expansion and contraction. Using Taiwan’s COVID-19 insurance-oversold events as a case–control setting, we compare the asymmetric jump risk effects on RV and realized semivariance (RSV). The results reveal that business cycle (BC) effects offset jump risk impacts, rendering intrinsic jump components statistically insignificant when BC information is omitted. During contraction periods, asymmetric jumps generate stronger negative RSV shocks, amplifying the leverage effect. Moreover, the predictive accuracy of RV critically depends on the prevailing business cycle state. By incorporating BC effects into the model, we recapture significant jump components and enhance volatility forecasting performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Risks
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/risks13110221
Primary Topic
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Business Cycle’s Impact on Volatility Forecasting: Recapturing Intrinsic Jump Components

Pao‐Peng Hsu, Son-Nan Chen
Risks
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
article

The Business Cycle’s Impact on Volatility Forecasting: Recapturing Intrinsic Jump Components

Pao‐Peng Hsu, Son-Nan Chen
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the leverage effect and realized volatility (RV) of stocks in the presence of asymmetric jumps across economic expansions and contractions. We extend the heterogeneous autoregressive-realized volatility (HAR-RV) model by incorporating a two-period Markov regime-switching model to capture Taiwan’s economic expansion and contraction. Using Taiwan’s COVID-19 insurance-oversold events as a case–control setting, we compare the asymmetric jump risk effects on RV and realized semivariance (RSV). The results reveal that business cycle (BC) effects offset jump risk impacts, rendering intrinsic jump components statistically insignificant when BC information is omitted. During contraction periods, asymmetric jumps generate stronger negative RSV shocks, amplifying the leverage effect. Moreover, the predictive accuracy of RV critically depends on the prevailing business cycle state. By incorporating BC effects into the model, we recapture significant jump components and enhance volatility forecasting performance.

RisksVol. 13(11)
Chaoyang University of Technology (TW), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Shanghai Advanced Research Institute (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.