Drivers of plant invasions and their scale-dependency in grasslands

Conservation and management policies for plant invasions often rely on coarse-scale data, while plant diversity effects on ecosystem functions and services are primarily driven by species interactions at small spatial scales. Yet, most evidence on invasion drivers at fine scales is limited to a single grain size, leaving uncertainty about their scale-dependency. Understanding such scale-dependency is essential for predicting and managing invasions effectively. We sampled plant communities across grassland habitats in Ukraine to assess how native species richness, environmental factors, and anthropogenic disturbances influence community invasion level – the proportions of all alien species, and separately for invasive species (fast-spreading aliens at advanced stages of invasion), archaeophytes (introduced before 1500 CE) and neophytes (post-1500 CE aliens). By analysing these groups across six fine-grain areas (0.001–100 m 2 ), we tested for scale-dependent effects. Native species richness was the strongest driver of invasions, showing negative effects that weakened with increasing scale. Alien species were dominated by archaeophytes and occurred most in dry grasslands, and least in fringe, alpine, and mesic types, driven by climatic and disturbance gradients. A range of abiotic and anthropogenic drivers, including precipitation, temperature, disturbance, land use and urbanization also influenced invasion levels, but their importance varied with scale. Notably, the scale-dependency of invasion drivers differed among archaeophytes, neophytes, and invasive species. Our results highlight the importance of separating alien groups and considering multiple spatial grains to avoid overlooking key drivers of invasion. Focusing on scale- and group-specific factors can enhance the ecological relevance and efficiency of conservation and management strategies targeting plant invasions. • Conservation relies on large-scale data, yet native–invasive species interactions occur at fine scales. • We tested scale-dependency of invasion drivers across six fine-grain sizes in grasslands. • Native diversity is the strongest invasion barrier, weakening effects with sampled grain size. • Climate, disturbance, microrelief and land use drive invasion level, and effects vary with scale. Neophytes responded more strongly to urbanization and cropland landscapes tahn archaeophytes. • Ignoring scale-dependency of invasion drivers hinders effective conservation and management efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Conservation
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111584
Primary Topic
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drivers of plant invasions and their scale-dependency in grasslands

Oksana Y. Buzhdygan, Iuliia Vasheniak, Анна Куземко, Dariia Borovyk et al.
Biological Conservation
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
article

Drivers of plant invasions and their scale-dependency in grasslands

Oksana Y. Buzhdygan, Iuliia Vasheniak, Анна Куземко, Dariia Borovyk, Jonathan M. Chase, Svitlana Iemelianova, Britta Tietjen, Iwona Dembicz, Jürgen Dengler, Joana Bergmann, Vasyl Budzhak, Denys Vynokurov, Olha Chusova, Monika Janišová, Selina Baldauf
article en

Abstract

Conservation and management policies for plant invasions often rely on coarse-scale data, while plant diversity effects on ecosystem functions and services are primarily driven by species interactions at small spatial scales. Yet, most evidence on invasion drivers at fine scales is limited to a single grain size, leaving uncertainty about their scale-dependency. Understanding such scale-dependency is essential for predicting and managing invasions effectively. We sampled plant communities across grassland habitats in Ukraine to assess how native species richness, environmental factors, and anthropogenic disturbances influence community invasion level – the proportions of all alien species, and separately for invasive species (fast-spreading aliens at advanced stages of invasion), archaeophytes (introduced before 1500 CE) and neophytes (post-1500 CE aliens). By analysing these groups across six fine-grain areas (0.001–100 m 2 ), we tested for scale-dependent effects. Native species richness was the strongest driver of invasions, showing negative effects that weakened with increasing scale. Alien species were dominated by archaeophytes and occurred most in dry grasslands, and least in fringe, alpine, and mesic types, driven by climatic and disturbance gradients. A range of abiotic and anthropogenic drivers, including precipitation, temperature, disturbance, land use and urbanization also influenced invasion levels, but their importance varied with scale. Notably, the scale-dependency of invasion drivers differed among archaeophytes, neophytes, and invasive species. Our results highlight the importance of separating alien groups and considering multiple spatial grains to avoid overlooking key drivers of invasion. Focusing on scale- and group-specific factors can enhance the ecological relevance and efficiency of conservation and management strategies targeting plant invasions. • Conservation relies on large-scale data, yet native–invasive species interactions occur at fine scales. • We tested scale-dependency of invasion drivers across six fine-grain sizes in grasslands. • Native diversity is the strongest invasion barrier, weakening effects with sampled grain size. • Climate, disturbance, microrelief and land use drive invasion level, and effects vary with scale. Neophytes responded more strongly to urbanization and cropland landscapes tahn archaeophytes. • Ignoring scale-dependency of invasion drivers hinders effective conservation and management efforts.

Biological ConservationVol. 313
National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy (UA), Vasyl' Stus Donetsk National University (UA), National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (UA), Masaryk University (CZ), German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE), ASKA Pharmaceutical (Japan) (JP), Institute of Botany of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (DE), Berlin Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research (DE), M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany (UA), University of Warsaw (PL), University of Bayreuth (DE), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE), ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.