Changing and Reframing the Norms of Pharmacy Graduate Education

Changing and reframing the norms of pharmacy-based graduate education are needed in a time when spending efficiency is paramount to maximize the output and impact of governmental investments in research. Pharmacy-based graduate education fills a critical void in expertise within the pharmaceutical industry, government, and academic entities to advance the discovery of treatments for and prevention of chronic disease. We have known of the critical role scientists from pharmacy-based graduate programs play in translating research from discovery to impact for decades. Our Academy has addressed this concern in publications dating back to 1942, calling for changes in the content, format, and organization of graduate education. Furthermore, we have repeatedly debated all aspects of the best way to educate, the definition of pharmacy research scope, and the competency requirements. This commentary addresses 3 key issues. While progress has been made over the years, the high cost and long time frame for educating these graduate students remain in our current programs. Specifically, the societal demand for our graduates in numerous venues can only be met if we reduce the onerously long format and structure of our graduate programs. In addition, graduate programs need a focus on competency-based skill development (which includes power skill assessment) and reduced didactic curricular requirements. We propose a series of bold goals and recommendations as a call for major changes to increase the efficiency of pharmacy-based graduate education and assess the required skills necessary to provide a robust pipeline of researchers for the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101894
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Changing and Reframing the Norms of Pharmacy Graduate Education

Russell B. Melchert, Samuel M. Poloyac, Gayle A. Brazeau, Evan T. Robinson
1 citations
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
1.22
article

Changing and Reframing the Norms of Pharmacy Graduate Education

Russell B. Melchert, Samuel M. Poloyac, Gayle A. Brazeau, Evan T. Robinson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Changing and reframing the norms of pharmacy-based graduate education are needed in a time when spending efficiency is paramount to maximize the output and impact of governmental investments in research. Pharmacy-based graduate education fills a critical void in expertise within the pharmaceutical industry, government, and academic entities to advance the discovery of treatments for and prevention of chronic disease. We have known of the critical role scientists from pharmacy-based graduate programs play in translating research from discovery to impact for decades. Our Academy has addressed this concern in publications dating back to 1942, calling for changes in the content, format, and organization of graduate education. Furthermore, we have repeatedly debated all aspects of the best way to educate, the definition of pharmacy research scope, and the competency requirements. This commentary addresses 3 key issues. While progress has been made over the years, the high cost and long time frame for educating these graduate students remain in our current programs. Specifically, the societal demand for our graduates in numerous venues can only be met if we reduce the onerously long format and structure of our graduate programs. In addition, graduate programs need a focus on competency-based skill development (which includes power skill assessment) and reduced didactic curricular requirements. We propose a series of bold goals and recommendations as a call for major changes to increase the efficiency of pharmacy-based graduate education and assess the required skills necessary to provide a robust pipeline of researchers for the future.

American Journal of Pharmaceutical EducationVol. 89(12)
Austin College (US), University of North Texas (US), University of North Texas Health Science Center (US), University of Missouri–Kansas City (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US), Marshall University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
1.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.