Working in (and between) art and health: challenges and missteps

Art can have a positive impact on health and well-being and be efficacious in health research and dissemination processes. However, creative, arts-based approaches to research and knowledge translation sometimes have a precarious toehold in the spheres of both health and art. In this paper, we report on failures, misunderstandings, difficulties and ethical tensions associated with work undertaken in, and between, art and health. Using collaborative autoethnography, we draw on professional experiences and relevant literature to present four core challenges that can be encountered, and should be considered, when working in the art and health space: (1) who is art for? (2) gatekeeping, (3) ethical tensions and (4) taste and quality. We share these challenges to make visible the often-tacit expectations, ways of working and hierarchies of knowledge that underpin arts and health work. In our discussion, we offer suggestions for overcoming these challenges, in the hope they will be useful to others working in arts and health. We raise and explore questions-about knowledge, value, art and ethics-that might not have definitive answers, but that are productive to interrogate before undertaking an arts and health endeavour.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Humanities
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2025-013316
Primary Topic
Empathy and Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Working in (and between) art and health: challenges and missteps

Katherine Boydell, Chloe Watfern, Ann Dadich, Priya Vaughan et al.
Medical Humanities
Empathy and Medical Education
article

Working in (and between) art and health: challenges and missteps

Katherine Boydell, Chloe Watfern, Ann Dadich, Priya Vaughan, Stephanie Habak, Barbara Doran
article en

Abstract

Art can have a positive impact on health and well-being and be efficacious in health research and dissemination processes. However, creative, arts-based approaches to research and knowledge translation sometimes have a precarious toehold in the spheres of both health and art. In this paper, we report on failures, misunderstandings, difficulties and ethical tensions associated with work undertaken in, and between, art and health. Using collaborative autoethnography, we draw on professional experiences and relevant literature to present four core challenges that can be encountered, and should be considered, when working in the art and health space: (1) who is art for? (2) gatekeeping, (3) ethical tensions and (4) taste and quality. We share these challenges to make visible the often-tacit expectations, ways of working and hierarchies of knowledge that underpin arts and health work. In our discussion, we offer suggestions for overcoming these challenges, in the hope they will be useful to others working in arts and health. We raise and explore questions-about knowledge, value, art and ethics-that might not have definitive answers, but that are productive to interrogate before undertaking an arts and health endeavour.

Medical Humanities
University of Technology Sydney (AU), Black Dog Institute (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), KPMG (Australia) (AU), Western Sydney University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Empathy and Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.