The impact of preoperative bone mineral density on outcomes following lower extremity megaprosthetic reconstruction for oncologic resections

There was no significant difference in revision rate following oncologic lower extremity megaprosthetic reconstruction in patients with or without low BMD. No patients with low BMD in this cohort experienced aseptic loosening or structural failure; however, there was a bias toward cement fixation in patients with low BMD. This may reflect calculated decisions by the surgeon when evaluating the patient's bone quality and their specific risk profile. Our findings suggest that patients with low BMD have similar outcomes to patients without low BMD undergoing oncologic megaprosthetic reconstructions by experienced surgeons. The specific effect of cemented vs uncemented fixation in patients with low BMD in the oncologic population deserves further investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bone
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2025.117704
Primary Topic
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of preoperative bone mineral density on outcomes following lower extremity megaprosthetic reconstruction for oncologic resections

Roy Colglazier, William C. Eward, Brian E. Brigman, Alexandra Krez et al.
Bone
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

The impact of preoperative bone mineral density on outcomes following lower extremity megaprosthetic reconstruction for oncologic resections

Roy Colglazier, William C. Eward, Brian E. Brigman, Alexandra Krez, Kevin A. Wu, Elizabeth Sachs, Julia D. Visgauss, Nicole L. Levine, Robert J. French, Emily M. Peairs
article en

Abstract

There was no significant difference in revision rate following oncologic lower extremity megaprosthetic reconstruction in patients with or without low BMD. No patients with low BMD in this cohort experienced aseptic loosening or structural failure; however, there was a bias toward cement fixation in patients with low BMD. This may reflect calculated decisions by the surgeon when evaluating the patient's bone quality and their specific risk profile. Our findings suggest that patients with low BMD have similar outcomes to patients without low BMD undergoing oncologic megaprosthetic reconstructions by experienced surgeons. The specific effect of cemented vs uncemented fixation in patients with low BMD in the oncologic population deserves further investigation.

BoneVol. 202
Duke University (US), Duke University Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The impact of preoperative bone mineral density on outcomes following lower extremity megaprosthetic reconstruction for oncologic resections — Roy Colglazier, William C. Eward, et al. · Bone (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS