Reflections on brand image: the influence of donor ideal and perceived charity brand congruence on charitable giving

Introduction Nonprofit branding in today’s digital and social media landscape is increasingly shaped by active audience participation, rather than solely by messaging from the organization. This study investigates how donors’ perceptions of congruence between their ideal and actual charities, measured as donor–brand congruence, influence the amount of charitable giving. Methods Using a survey based on the Aaker Brand Personality Scale, participants evaluated both their actual and ideal charities across 15 facets within five brand personality dimensions, including Sincerity, Excitement, Competence, Sophistication, and Ruggedness. Participants also provided demographic data, personality traits, and annual donation amounts. Results The findings reveal that donors perceiving a match between their ideal and actual charity brands self-report more financial contributions. Additionally, age and emotional stability correlated with greater perceived congruence. Discussion The results suggest that forming a match between a nonprofit’s actual brand and the audience’s ideal brand can be essential for creating nonprofit brand identities that resonate within a hyper-personalized (tailored to individual preferences), polycentric (influenced by many actors) communications environment. By encouraging donor input and discovering their aspirational values, nonprofits can cultivate authentic connections, strengthen loyalty, and encourage word-of-mouth advocacy for their cause.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Communication
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1682863
Primary Topic
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reflections on brand image: the influence of donor ideal and perceived charity brand congruence on charitable giving

Elizabeth Crisp Crawford, Jeremy Jackson
Frontiers in Communication
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
article

Reflections on brand image: the influence of donor ideal and perceived charity brand congruence on charitable giving

Elizabeth Crisp Crawford, Jeremy Jackson
article en

Abstract

Introduction Nonprofit branding in today’s digital and social media landscape is increasingly shaped by active audience participation, rather than solely by messaging from the organization. This study investigates how donors’ perceptions of congruence between their ideal and actual charities, measured as donor–brand congruence, influence the amount of charitable giving. Methods Using a survey based on the Aaker Brand Personality Scale, participants evaluated both their actual and ideal charities across 15 facets within five brand personality dimensions, including Sincerity, Excitement, Competence, Sophistication, and Ruggedness. Participants also provided demographic data, personality traits, and annual donation amounts. Results The findings reveal that donors perceiving a match between their ideal and actual charity brands self-report more financial contributions. Additionally, age and emotional stability correlated with greater perceived congruence. Discussion The results suggest that forming a match between a nonprofit’s actual brand and the audience’s ideal brand can be essential for creating nonprofit brand identities that resonate within a hyper-personalized (tailored to individual preferences), polycentric (influenced by many actors) communications environment. By encouraging donor input and discovering their aspirational values, nonprofits can cultivate authentic connections, strengthen loyalty, and encourage word-of-mouth advocacy for their cause.

Frontiers in CommunicationVol. 10
Fayetteville State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.