Diabetic retinopathy enhances coronary artery calcium-based cardiovascular risk stratification in patients with type 2 diabetes: insights from the ACCoDiab study

<title>Abstract</title> Background The Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score is a validated imaging biomarker that is used in clinical practice to improve cardiovascular risk stratification in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). However, residual risk remains, particularly in patients with moderate CAC. Diabetic retinopathy (DR), a microvascular complication of diabetes, may reflect systemic vascular vulnerability and provide additional prognostic information. Methods This observational cohort study was conducted as part of the primary prevention ACCoDiab study. Four hundred and twenty-four patients with T2DM and no prior history of cardiovascular events underwent CAC scoring and clinical assessment, including screening for DR. The study population comprised 175 females and 249 males, with an average age of 60.9 years. Patients were monitored for seven years for cardiovascular events, including nonfatal myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, revascularization of the limbs due to peripheral artery disease and cardiovascular death. Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and net reclassification improvement (NRI) were employed to evaluate the prognostic value of DR alongside CAC score with the aim of developing a simple cardiovascular risk score. Results Fifty patients (11.8%) experienced cardiovascular events. DR was significantly more prevalent among those who experienced events (58% vs. 25%, p &lt; 0.001). Both CAC score and DR were independently associated with cardiovascular events. Combining the CAC and DR models significantly improved the prediction of events over the CAC model alone (AUC 75.3 vs. 67.8, p = 0.011), with even further improvement when adjusted for traditional risk factors (AUC 78.2, vs 71.3 p = 0.014 vs. the CAC model alone). The presence of DR reclassified a significant proportion of patients into higher risk categories, particularly among those with moderate CAC scores. Conclusion The combination of DR and CAC score significantly enhances cardiovascular risk stratification in patients living with T2DM, even after adjustment for traditional risk factors. Trial registration NCT03920683

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cardiovascular Diabetology
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-026-03314-w
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diabetic retinopathy enhances coronary artery calcium-based cardiovascular risk stratification in patients with type 2 diabetes: insights from the ACCoDiab study

Alban Redheuil, Anne-Caroline Jeannin, Thomas Broussaud, Franck Phan et al.
Cardiovascular Diabetology
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
article

Diabetic retinopathy enhances coronary artery calcium-based cardiovascular risk stratification in patients with type 2 diabetes: insights from the ACCoDiab study

Alban Redheuil, Anne-Caroline Jeannin, Thomas Broussaud, Franck Phan, Antonio Gallo, Anne Toulgoat, Samia Boussouar, Fabrizio Andréelli, Suzanne Laroche, Olivier Bourron
article en

Abstract

<title>Abstract</title> Background The Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score is a validated imaging biomarker that is used in clinical practice to improve cardiovascular risk stratification in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). However, residual risk remains, particularly in patients with moderate CAC. Diabetic retinopathy (DR), a microvascular complication of diabetes, may reflect systemic vascular vulnerability and provide additional prognostic information. Methods This observational cohort study was conducted as part of the primary prevention ACCoDiab study. Four hundred and twenty-four patients with T2DM and no prior history of cardiovascular events underwent CAC scoring and clinical assessment, including screening for DR. The study population comprised 175 females and 249 males, with an average age of 60.9 years. Patients were monitored for seven years for cardiovascular events, including nonfatal myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, revascularization of the limbs due to peripheral artery disease and cardiovascular death. Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and net reclassification improvement (NRI) were employed to evaluate the prognostic value of DR alongside CAC score with the aim of developing a simple cardiovascular risk score. Results Fifty patients (11.8%) experienced cardiovascular events. DR was significantly more prevalent among those who experienced events (58% vs. 25%, p &lt; 0.001). Both CAC score and DR were independently associated with cardiovascular events. Combining the CAC and DR models significantly improved the prediction of events over the CAC model alone (AUC 75.3 vs. 67.8, p = 0.011), with even further improvement when adjusted for traditional risk factors (AUC 78.2, vs 71.3 p = 0.014 vs. the CAC model alone). The presence of DR reclassified a significant proportion of patients into higher risk categories, particularly among those with moderate CAC scores. Conclusion The combination of DR and CAC score significantly enhances cardiovascular risk stratification in patients living with T2DM, even after adjustment for traditional risk factors. Trial registration NCT03920683

Cardiovascular Diabetology
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Inserm (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Nutrition et obésité : approches systémiques (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR), Unité de recherche sur les maladies cardiovasculaires et métaboliques (FR), Hôpital Charles-Foix (FR), Fondation pour l’innovation en Cadiométabolisme et Nutrition (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.