Democratizing life cycle assessment by developing a streamlined model of greenhouse gas emissions from US natural gas supply chains

Summary: Natural gas (NG) supply chains contribute substantially to the global energy supply and anthropogenic methane emissions, making them frequent subjects of life cycle assessments (LCAs). To better characterize central tendencies and variability, we systematically reviewed and harmonized published estimates of life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from United States NG supply chains. Results informed a streamlined LCA model (SLiNG-GHG: streamlined LCAs of NG-GHGs) that quantifies carbon dioxide and methane from three gates: transmission, distribution, and shipping. Median estimates employing harmonized emission inputs, are 10, 11, and 21 g CO2e/MJ gas (100-year global warming potentials [GWPs]), and 20, 22, and 33 g CO2e/MJ gas (20-year GWPs), delivered to each gate, respectively. Alternatively, inputting available, independent methane measurements, SLiNG-GHG estimates varied from −23% to +316% relative to baseline. Bottom-up inventories used in LCAs tend to underestimate methane compared with measurements. Results underscore the need for open-source, streamlined LCA models that can easily incorporate rapidly evolving measurements for non-experts like investors and regulators. Science for society: Natural gas is an important part of the current energy mix, yet uncertainty surrounding methane emissions is a challenge that needs to be addressed. Bottom-up inventories often underestimate emissions compared with direct measurements. This discrepancy can undermine market credibility and public trust in greenhouse gas (GHG) reporting. We address this challenge with SLiNG-GHG, a streamlined, open-source life cycle assessment model that makes emission analysis accessible to both experts and non-experts. The model development was grounded in data from a wide range of natural gas studies. We demonstrate the use of the model by integrating measurement datasets, bridging the gap between inventories and measurements. The model empowers policymakers, regulators, investors, and civilians to better evaluate natural gas emissions. The tool opens collaborative pathways across engineering, policy, and environmental science, enabling informed decision-making and better emission mitigation efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cell Reports Sustainability
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsus.2025.100554
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Democratizing life cycle assessment by developing a streamlined model of greenhouse gas emissions from US natural gas supply chains

Garvin Heath, Adittya Srikanth, Sarah Marie Jordaan, Ramesh Sai Jayaraman
Cell Reports Sustainability
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
article

Democratizing life cycle assessment by developing a streamlined model of greenhouse gas emissions from US natural gas supply chains

Garvin Heath, Adittya Srikanth, Sarah Marie Jordaan, Ramesh Sai Jayaraman
article en

Abstract

Summary: Natural gas (NG) supply chains contribute substantially to the global energy supply and anthropogenic methane emissions, making them frequent subjects of life cycle assessments (LCAs). To better characterize central tendencies and variability, we systematically reviewed and harmonized published estimates of life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from United States NG supply chains. Results informed a streamlined LCA model (SLiNG-GHG: streamlined LCAs of NG-GHGs) that quantifies carbon dioxide and methane from three gates: transmission, distribution, and shipping. Median estimates employing harmonized emission inputs, are 10, 11, and 21 g CO2e/MJ gas (100-year global warming potentials [GWPs]), and 20, 22, and 33 g CO2e/MJ gas (20-year GWPs), delivered to each gate, respectively. Alternatively, inputting available, independent methane measurements, SLiNG-GHG estimates varied from −23% to +316% relative to baseline. Bottom-up inventories used in LCAs tend to underestimate methane compared with measurements. Results underscore the need for open-source, streamlined LCA models that can easily incorporate rapidly evolving measurements for non-experts like investors and regulators. Science for society: Natural gas is an important part of the current energy mix, yet uncertainty surrounding methane emissions is a challenge that needs to be addressed. Bottom-up inventories often underestimate emissions compared with direct measurements. This discrepancy can undermine market credibility and public trust in greenhouse gas (GHG) reporting. We address this challenge with SLiNG-GHG, a streamlined, open-source life cycle assessment model that makes emission analysis accessible to both experts and non-experts. The model development was grounded in data from a wide range of natural gas studies. We demonstrate the use of the model by integrating measurement datasets, bridging the gap between inventories and measurements. The model empowers policymakers, regulators, investors, and civilians to better evaluate natural gas emissions. The tool opens collaborative pathways across engineering, policy, and environmental science, enabling informed decision-making and better emission mitigation efforts.

Cell Reports SustainabilityVol. 3(1)
National Laboratory of the Rockies (US), Institute for Sustainability (GB), McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.