Towards a standardized methodology and dataset for evaluating LLM-based digital forensic timeline analysis

Large language models (LLMs) have widespread adoption in many domains, including digital forensics. While prior research has largely centered on case studies and examples demonstrating how LLMs can assist forensic investigations, deeper explorations remain limited, i.e., a standardized approach for precise performance evaluations is lacking. Inspired by the NIST Computer Forensic Tool Testing Program, this paper proposes a standardized methodology to quantitatively evaluate the application of LLMs for digital forensic tasks, specifically in timeline analysis. The paper describes the components of the methodology, including the dataset, timeline generation, and ground truth development. In addition, the paper recommends the use of BLEU and ROUGE metrics for the quantitative evaluation of LLMs through case studies or tasks involving timeline analysis. Experimental results using ChatGPT demonstrate that the proposed methodology can effectively evaluate LLM-based forensic timeline analysis. Finally, we discuss the limitations of applying LLMs to forensic timeline analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forensic Science International Digital Investigation
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2025.301982
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital and Cyber Forensics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards a standardized methodology and dataset for evaluating LLM-based digital forensic timeline analysis

Mark Scanlon, Frank Breitinger, Hudan Studiawan
1 citations
Forensic Science International Digital Investigation
Digital and Cyber Forensics
3.25
article

Towards a standardized methodology and dataset for evaluating LLM-based digital forensic timeline analysis

Mark Scanlon, Frank Breitinger, Hudan Studiawan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have widespread adoption in many domains, including digital forensics. While prior research has largely centered on case studies and examples demonstrating how LLMs can assist forensic investigations, deeper explorations remain limited, i.e., a standardized approach for precise performance evaluations is lacking. Inspired by the NIST Computer Forensic Tool Testing Program, this paper proposes a standardized methodology to quantitatively evaluate the application of LLMs for digital forensic tasks, specifically in timeline analysis. The paper describes the components of the methodology, including the dataset, timeline generation, and ground truth development. In addition, the paper recommends the use of BLEU and ROUGE metrics for the quantitative evaluation of LLMs through case studies or tasks involving timeline analysis. Experimental results using ChatGPT demonstrate that the proposed methodology can effectively evaluate LLM-based forensic timeline analysis. Finally, we discuss the limitations of applying LLMs to forensic timeline analysis.

Forensic Science International Digital InvestigationVol. 54
University College Dublin (IE), Technische Hochschule Augsburg (DE), Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology (ID), University of Augsburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Digital and Cyber Forensics
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Towards a standardized methodology and dataset for evaluating LLM-based digital forensic timeline analysis — Mark Scanlon, Frank Breitinger, et al. · Forensic Science International Digital Investigation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS