Gambling for market recovery? European insurers' corporate bond investments during market stress

Abstract Using daily stock market data for European insurers, I investigate how a stock market contraction, as experienced during the COVID‐19 pandemic, affects insurers' credit risk allocation of their corporate bond portfolio. I find that insurers shift their portfolio holdings pro‐cyclically towards lower credit risk assets in the first month of the market contraction. As the crisis progresses, I find evidence for counter‐cyclical, riskier investment behavior by European insurers, especially in high‐yield instruments, that can neither be explained by credit rating downgrades of held bonds nor by hedging with CDS derivatives. This counter‐cyclical investment behavior cannot be observed for US firms, which provides evidence for a difference in investment behavior between US and European insurers. The observed investment behavior of European insurers could be beneficial for systemic stability by attenuating price declines through insurance liquidity provision, but excessive risk‐taking by insurance companies over longer periods can also reinforce systemic stress.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Risk & Insurance
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.70028
Primary Topic
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gambling for market recovery? European insurers' corporate bond investments during market stress

Marcel Beyer
Journal of Risk & Insurance
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
article

Gambling for market recovery? European insurers' corporate bond investments during market stress

Marcel Beyer
article en

Abstract

Abstract Using daily stock market data for European insurers, I investigate how a stock market contraction, as experienced during the COVID‐19 pandemic, affects insurers' credit risk allocation of their corporate bond portfolio. I find that insurers shift their portfolio holdings pro‐cyclically towards lower credit risk assets in the first month of the market contraction. As the crisis progresses, I find evidence for counter‐cyclical, riskier investment behavior by European insurers, especially in high‐yield instruments, that can neither be explained by credit rating downgrades of held bonds nor by hedging with CDS derivatives. This counter‐cyclical investment behavior cannot be observed for US firms, which provides evidence for a difference in investment behavior between US and European insurers. The observed investment behavior of European insurers could be beneficial for systemic stability by attenuating price declines through insurance liquidity provision, but excessive risk‐taking by insurance companies over longer periods can also reinforce systemic stress.

Journal of Risk & InsuranceVol. 92(4)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.