Monitoring cropland cultivation, abandonment, fallowing and recultivation dynamics with regard to conflict intensity in war-affected Ukraine

Three years of sustained shelling, mining, and active combat have caused major cropland abandonment in Ukraine, particularly along frontlines. Existing estimates of abandoned areas vary up to fourfold, due to inconsistent definitions, baselines and biased estimators of area. Many studies classify fallow land – temporarily unused but managed – as abandoned. In contrast, abandoned lands (neither cultivated nor managed) are often contaminated by unexploded ordnance, mines, or chemicals, requiring clearance before recultivation. Disentangling fallow from abandoned cropland is therefore crucial for post-war recovery planning and for determining tax relief for farmers unable to access their fields. We applied a two-level stratified random sampling design and unbiased estimators of area to quantify the extent of cultivated, fallow, and abandoned cropland. Four regions with distinct conflict dynamics were delineated using the Armed Conflict Location and Event Dataset, and within each region stratified random samples were drawn from a Planet-based cultivation status map. Between 2021 and 2024, full Ukraine’s cultivated area declined by 2.5 Mha (-8.5%). By 2024, 7% of cropland (2.213 ± 0.256 Mha) was abandoned, of which 1.121 ± 0.148 Mha to 1.671 ± 0.169 Mha may be permanently lost to cultivation, primarily along frontlines. Fallow areas increased nationally, especially in territories reclaimed from occupation. In 2024 alone, up to 0.472 ± 0.143 Mha were recultivated, by far exceeding official land clearance figures and suggesting widespread reliance on informal or self-organized demining. These results establish a replicable framework for monitoring land-use dynamics in conflict zones, supporting evidence-based recovery, landmine clearance prioritization, and agricultural policy planning in post-war Ukraine. • Cultivated, fallow and abandoned area estimation in Ukraine (2021-2024). • 7% of Ukraine’s cropland abandoned in 2024. • Recultivation outpaced official demining, indicating informal land clearance. • Framework supports policy, tax relief and demining prioritization in conflict zones.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science of Remote Sensing
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2025.100326
Primary Topic
Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monitoring cropland cultivation, abandonment, fallowing and recultivation dynamics with regard to conflict intensity in war-affected Ukraine

Shabarinath S. Nair, Fangjie Li, Oleksandra Oliinyk, Sergii Skakun et al.
Science of Remote Sensing
Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
article

Monitoring cropland cultivation, abandonment, fallowing and recultivation dynamics with regard to conflict intensity in war-affected Ukraine

Shabarinath S. Nair, Fangjie Li, Oleksandra Oliinyk, Sergii Skakun, Josef Wagner, Erik Duncan, Jean Rehbinder, Inbal Becker‐Reshef, Françoise Nerry
article en

Abstract

Three years of sustained shelling, mining, and active combat have caused major cropland abandonment in Ukraine, particularly along frontlines. Existing estimates of abandoned areas vary up to fourfold, due to inconsistent definitions, baselines and biased estimators of area. Many studies classify fallow land – temporarily unused but managed – as abandoned. In contrast, abandoned lands (neither cultivated nor managed) are often contaminated by unexploded ordnance, mines, or chemicals, requiring clearance before recultivation. Disentangling fallow from abandoned cropland is therefore crucial for post-war recovery planning and for determining tax relief for farmers unable to access their fields. We applied a two-level stratified random sampling design and unbiased estimators of area to quantify the extent of cultivated, fallow, and abandoned cropland. Four regions with distinct conflict dynamics were delineated using the Armed Conflict Location and Event Dataset, and within each region stratified random samples were drawn from a Planet-based cultivation status map. Between 2021 and 2024, full Ukraine’s cultivated area declined by 2.5 Mha (-8.5%). By 2024, 7% of cropland (2.213 ± 0.256 Mha) was abandoned, of which 1.121 ± 0.148 Mha to 1.671 ± 0.169 Mha may be permanently lost to cultivation, primarily along frontlines. Fallow areas increased nationally, especially in territories reclaimed from occupation. In 2024 alone, up to 0.472 ± 0.143 Mha were recultivated, by far exceeding official land clearance figures and suggesting widespread reliance on informal or self-organized demining. These results establish a replicable framework for monitoring land-use dynamics in conflict zones, supporting evidence-based recovery, landmine clearance prioritization, and agricultural policy planning in post-war Ukraine. • Cultivated, fallow and abandoned area estimation in Ukraine (2021-2024). • 7% of Ukraine’s cropland abandoned in 2024. • Recultivation outpaced official demining, indicating informal land clearance. • Framework supports policy, tax relief and demining prioritization in conflict zones.

Science of Remote SensingVol. 12
Laboratoire des Sciences de l'Ingénieur, de l'Informatique et de l'Imagerie (FR), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, United States Agency for International Development, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.