Sustainability assessment of integrated vs. conventional farming: Life cycle and energy flow perspectives in the subtropical North-Western India

With rising global food demands, developing sustainable production systems that enhance productivity, profitability, and soil health while reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and environmental impact is essential. Therefore, a study was conducted during 2021-22 and 2022-23 on an integrated farming system (IFS) model of 1.0 ha with six components (crop, horticulture, agroforestry, dairy, aquaculture and boundary plantation) and two sub-units (FYM and biogas) established at the Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India to assess the sustainability, productivity, profitability, energy flows and environmental impact for successfully diversifying the conventional rice-wheat system in the Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) of Northwestern India. The results showed that the IFS model (46.80 t/ha) produced 3.89 times more system productivity compared to the conventional rice-wheat system (12.03 t/ha), which resulted in higher gross returns (USD 10992.25/year), net returns (2820.36 USD/year), and BC ratio (1.68). Furthermore, 30,700 kg of cow dung was recycled through the FYM unit and 10,415 kg through the biogas unit in the IFS model, enhancing soil health properties (physical, chemical, and biological) compared to initial values and the conventional rice-wheat system. The IFS model utilized 70.62% renewable energy (91909 MJ), with organic waste recycling contributing approximately 35.58% to the total energy input, whereas the conventional rice-wheat system relied more on non-renewable energy (68.92%). The global warming potential of the IFS model (14,191 kg CO 2 eq.) was lower than the conventional rice-wheat system (19,229 kg CO 2 eq.), with on-farm emissions being the major contributor, accounting for 54.62% and 86.43%, respectively. The IFS model showed better environmental impacts and net energy gains, proving more remunerative than the conventional rice-wheat system. Hence, large-scale adoption of the IFS model is a sustainable diversification option to improve productivity and profitability in an environmentally friendly manner. • The IFS model enhances productivity, profitability and employment over the conventional rice-wheat system. • Organic waste recycling in IFS improves overall soil health. • IFS relies on renewable energy, whereas rice-wheat depends on non-renewables. • IFS reduced global warming potential by 26.2% compared to the rice-wheat system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.101015
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainability assessment of integrated vs. conventional farming: Life cycle and energy flow perspectives in the subtropical North-Western India

Gurshaminder Singh, Kartik Sharma, Gurmeet Singh Dheri, Sohan Singh Walia et al.
1 citations
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.72
article

Sustainability assessment of integrated vs. conventional farming: Life cycle and energy flow perspectives in the subtropical North-Western India

Gurshaminder Singh, Kartik Sharma, Gurmeet Singh Dheri, Sohan Singh Walia, Venkatesh Paramesh, N. Ravisankar, Sunil Kumar, Rakshit Bhagat
article en
1 citations

Abstract

With rising global food demands, developing sustainable production systems that enhance productivity, profitability, and soil health while reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and environmental impact is essential. Therefore, a study was conducted during 2021-22 and 2022-23 on an integrated farming system (IFS) model of 1.0 ha with six components (crop, horticulture, agroforestry, dairy, aquaculture and boundary plantation) and two sub-units (FYM and biogas) established at the Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India to assess the sustainability, productivity, profitability, energy flows and environmental impact for successfully diversifying the conventional rice-wheat system in the Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) of Northwestern India. The results showed that the IFS model (46.80 t/ha) produced 3.89 times more system productivity compared to the conventional rice-wheat system (12.03 t/ha), which resulted in higher gross returns (USD 10992.25/year), net returns (2820.36 USD/year), and BC ratio (1.68). Furthermore, 30,700 kg of cow dung was recycled through the FYM unit and 10,415 kg through the biogas unit in the IFS model, enhancing soil health properties (physical, chemical, and biological) compared to initial values and the conventional rice-wheat system. The IFS model utilized 70.62% renewable energy (91909 MJ), with organic waste recycling contributing approximately 35.58% to the total energy input, whereas the conventional rice-wheat system relied more on non-renewable energy (68.92%). The global warming potential of the IFS model (14,191 kg CO 2 eq.) was lower than the conventional rice-wheat system (19,229 kg CO 2 eq.), with on-farm emissions being the major contributor, accounting for 54.62% and 86.43%, respectively. The IFS model showed better environmental impacts and net energy gains, proving more remunerative than the conventional rice-wheat system. Hence, large-scale adoption of the IFS model is a sustainable diversification option to improve productivity and profitability in an environmentally friendly manner. • The IFS model enhances productivity, profitability and employment over the conventional rice-wheat system. • Organic waste recycling in IFS improves overall soil health. • IFS relies on renewable energy, whereas rice-wheat depends on non-renewables. • IFS reduced global warming potential by 26.2% compared to the rice-wheat system.

Environmental and Sustainability IndicatorsVol. 28
Indian Council of Agricultural Research (IN), Central Coastal Agricultural Research Institute (IN), ICAR-Indian Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology (IN), Punjab Agricultural University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.