Improving the representation of plant water stress and water use in Earth System Models

Projections of terrestrial climate feedbacks from Earth System Models (ESMs) depend on simulated carbon and water dynamics of vegetation, and their credibility depends on realistic representation of water stress responses. Here, we discuss how models simulate plant hydraulic processes and identify opportunities to improve confidence in model outputs. We focus on the vegetation sub-models that represent plant physiology and hydrodynamics, and also on groundwater flow models, which could influence water availability. Recently implemented plant hydrodynamic frameworks allow ESMs to represent water transport through plants but depend on crudely estimated fixed trait values. Few data are available for parameterizing, assessing, and validating these models across landscapes and at large scales. Furthermore, global models do not account for fine-scale soil water and groundwater flow patterns that influence growth and mortality. We encourage the development of model-compatible databases that include vetted data on plant hydraulic traits, states, and responses to drought. We also encourage efficient model representation of sub-grid variation in slopes, soil depths, and groundwater accessibility. Finally, we recommend using physically informed artificial intelligence approaches to integrate knowledge from process-based models and data from field observations, experiments, and remote-sensing products toward better prediction of ecosystem dynamics under water stress at large scales.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Phytologist
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.70687
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving the representation of plant water stress and water use in Earth System Models

Kimberly A. Novick, Chonggang Xu, Daniel P. Beverly, Yilin Fang et al.
New Phytologist
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
article

Improving the representation of plant water stress and water use in Earth System Models

Kimberly A. Novick, Chonggang Xu, Daniel P. Beverly, Yilin Fang, Richard P. Phillips, Indira Paudel, Zachary Robbins, Scott A. M. McAdam, Ian M. Rimer, Jeffrey S. Dukes, Elin M. Jacobs, Chang Liao
article en

Abstract

Projections of terrestrial climate feedbacks from Earth System Models (ESMs) depend on simulated carbon and water dynamics of vegetation, and their credibility depends on realistic representation of water stress responses. Here, we discuss how models simulate plant hydraulic processes and identify opportunities to improve confidence in model outputs. We focus on the vegetation sub-models that represent plant physiology and hydrodynamics, and also on groundwater flow models, which could influence water availability. Recently implemented plant hydrodynamic frameworks allow ESMs to represent water transport through plants but depend on crudely estimated fixed trait values. Few data are available for parameterizing, assessing, and validating these models across landscapes and at large scales. Furthermore, global models do not account for fine-scale soil water and groundwater flow patterns that influence growth and mortality. We encourage the development of model-compatible databases that include vetted data on plant hydraulic traits, states, and responses to drought. We also encourage efficient model representation of sub-grid variation in slopes, soil depths, and groundwater accessibility. Finally, we recommend using physically informed artificial intelligence approaches to integrate knowledge from process-based models and data from field observations, experiments, and remote-sensing products toward better prediction of ecosystem dynamics under water stress at large scales.

New PhytologistVol. 249(1)
Los Alamos National Laboratory (US), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US), Carnegie Institution for Science (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.