GFRP reinforcement in RC structures in seismic zones

The application of glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars as reinforcement to concrete structures in seismic zones remains restricted by current standards, including ACI 440.11–22, and IBC 2024 due to concerns regarding the lack of ductility and energy dissipation associated with GFRP reinforcement. This paper explores strategies to overcome these limitations, focusing on the design of GFRP-reinforced concrete (GFRP-RC) structures in seismic design categories (SDCs) B and C, which correspond to regions with low to moderate seismic activity. Two approaches are proposed: hybrid reinforcement design, combining GFRP and steel reinforcement, and resistance-based design, using GFRP reinforcement exclusively. Hybrid reinforcement leverages the established principles of ACI 318–19 to ensure controlled failure mechanisms and effective energy dissipation. Conversely, resistance-based design emphasizes preventing brittle failure by ensuring sufficient resistance in structures with low ductility demands. The study highlights the potential of these approaches to enhance the durability and sustainability of structures in aggressive environments or when alternative concrete constituents that may accelerate steel corrosion are used. The paper discusses specific provisions of beam-column frames in seismic design categories B (SDC B) and C (SDC C). By introducing criteria for the use of GFRP reinforcement to concrete structures in seismic design, this research addresses a critical gap in current standards and supports the broader adoption of GFRP in structural engineering. These approaches have been recently adopted by the Saudi Building Code (SBC).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Structures
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2025.110589
Primary Topic
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GFRP reinforcement in RC structures in seismic zones

Antonio Nanni, Gennaro Magliulo, Danilo D’Angela, Chiara Di Salvatore et al.
Structures
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
article

GFRP reinforcement in RC structures in seismic zones

Antonio Nanni, Gennaro Magliulo, Danilo D’Angela, Chiara Di Salvatore, Federico Tuozzo
article en

Abstract

The application of glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars as reinforcement to concrete structures in seismic zones remains restricted by current standards, including ACI 440.11–22, and IBC 2024 due to concerns regarding the lack of ductility and energy dissipation associated with GFRP reinforcement. This paper explores strategies to overcome these limitations, focusing on the design of GFRP-reinforced concrete (GFRP-RC) structures in seismic design categories (SDCs) B and C, which correspond to regions with low to moderate seismic activity. Two approaches are proposed: hybrid reinforcement design, combining GFRP and steel reinforcement, and resistance-based design, using GFRP reinforcement exclusively. Hybrid reinforcement leverages the established principles of ACI 318–19 to ensure controlled failure mechanisms and effective energy dissipation. Conversely, resistance-based design emphasizes preventing brittle failure by ensuring sufficient resistance in structures with low ductility demands. The study highlights the potential of these approaches to enhance the durability and sustainability of structures in aggressive environments or when alternative concrete constituents that may accelerate steel corrosion are used. The paper discusses specific provisions of beam-column frames in seismic design categories B (SDC B) and C (SDC C). By introducing criteria for the use of GFRP reinforcement to concrete structures in seismic design, this research addresses a critical gap in current standards and supports the broader adoption of GFRP in structural engineering. These approaches have been recently adopted by the Saudi Building Code (SBC).

StructuresVol. 82
University of Miami (US), Construction Technologies Institute (IT), Federico II University Hospital (IT), University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.