The Politics of Acknowledgements: Strategy, Sincerity and Scholarly Gratitude in Burma/Myanmar Studies

ABSTRACT Acknowledgements are an important way to publicly address intellectual debts and to express appreciation for the relationality of scholarship, which too often is seen as an individual product. In Burma/Myanmar studies, acknowledgements often follow particular conventions because of the authoritarian context and the colonial roots of the discipline. While acknowledgements can be seen idealistically as ‘paratexts’ that build scholarly community, or cynically as performative documents that seek to establish credibility, I argue that they often contain a combination of what Buddhists would call parahita (benefit for others) and atahita (benefit for self)—and that we can move toward the former by honestly examining the latter. This paper explores the ethics of acknowledging and asking permission to acknowledge collaborators who are situated inside, outside, and on the borders of the country and of academia, within a system of economic and political inequality stemming from coloniality and authoritarianism in Burma/Myanmar. I offer an unscientific typology of ‘moves’ that authors use to acknowledge others they perceive as more powerful, less powerful, or equally powerful. I also lay out recommendations for ethical practice in acknowledgements, which might mitigate inequalities and inspire research as mutual aid.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia Pacific Viewpoint
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.70022
Primary Topic
Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Politics of Acknowledgements: Strategy, Sincerity and Scholarly Gratitude in Burma/Myanmar Studies

Rosalie Metro
Asia Pacific Viewpoint
Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography
article

The Politics of Acknowledgements: Strategy, Sincerity and Scholarly Gratitude in Burma/Myanmar Studies

Rosalie Metro
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Acknowledgements are an important way to publicly address intellectual debts and to express appreciation for the relationality of scholarship, which too often is seen as an individual product. In Burma/Myanmar studies, acknowledgements often follow particular conventions because of the authoritarian context and the colonial roots of the discipline. While acknowledgements can be seen idealistically as ‘paratexts’ that build scholarly community, or cynically as performative documents that seek to establish credibility, I argue that they often contain a combination of what Buddhists would call parahita (benefit for others) and atahita (benefit for self)—and that we can move toward the former by honestly examining the latter. This paper explores the ethics of acknowledging and asking permission to acknowledge collaborators who are situated inside, outside, and on the borders of the country and of academia, within a system of economic and political inequality stemming from coloniality and authoritarianism in Burma/Myanmar. I offer an unscientific typology of ‘moves’ that authors use to acknowledge others they perceive as more powerful, less powerful, or equally powerful. I also lay out recommendations for ethical practice in acknowledgements, which might mitigate inequalities and inspire research as mutual aid.

Asia Pacific Viewpoint
University of Missouri (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.