A comprehensive dataset on stakeholder participation in international accounting standards board’s due process (2001–2024): Insights into legitimacy, engagement, and influence in international accounting standard-setting

This article presents an extensive dataset capturing stakeholder participation in the due process of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) from 2001 to 2024. It systematically records and analyzes 23,925 instances of participation from 5046 unique entities across 202 standard-setting projects, providing valuable insights into stakeholder engagement patterns, geographic and institutional influences, and legitimacy strategies employed by the IASB. The dataset distinguishes between individual and joint submissions, facilitating nuanced analyses of stakeholder motivations and engagement intensity. Demographic variables such as geographic origin, legal tradition, organizational type, and historical participation rates are included, enabling researchers to investigate institutional drivers and barriers affecting stakeholder involvement. By shedding light on variations in participation over critical periods-before and after International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) adoption, during the global financial crisis, and following increased procedural emphasis as a legitimate strategy-the dataset supports further examination of IASB's legitimacy strategies, stakeholder influence, and international accounting standard-setting dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Data in Brief
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2025.112229
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comprehensive dataset on stakeholder participation in international accounting standards board’s due process (2001–2024): Insights into legitimacy, engagement, and influence in international accounting standard-setting

Francisco Fernández‐Navarro, Mar Ortiz-Gómez, Horacio Molina Sánchez
Data in Brief
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

A comprehensive dataset on stakeholder participation in international accounting standards board’s due process (2001–2024): Insights into legitimacy, engagement, and influence in international accounting standard-setting

Francisco Fernández‐Navarro, Mar Ortiz-Gómez, Horacio Molina Sánchez
article en

Abstract

This article presents an extensive dataset capturing stakeholder participation in the due process of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) from 2001 to 2024. It systematically records and analyzes 23,925 instances of participation from 5046 unique entities across 202 standard-setting projects, providing valuable insights into stakeholder engagement patterns, geographic and institutional influences, and legitimacy strategies employed by the IASB. The dataset distinguishes between individual and joint submissions, facilitating nuanced analyses of stakeholder motivations and engagement intensity. Demographic variables such as geographic origin, legal tradition, organizational type, and historical participation rates are included, enabling researchers to investigate institutional drivers and barriers affecting stakeholder involvement. By shedding light on variations in participation over critical periods-before and after International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) adoption, during the global financial crisis, and following increased procedural emphasis as a legitimate strategy-the dataset supports further examination of IASB's legitimacy strategies, stakeholder influence, and international accounting standard-setting dynamics.

Data in BriefVol. 63
Universidad Loyola Andalucía (ES), Universidad de Málaga (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.