Electric vehicle users’ charging patterns and selection considerations at public charging stations

• Survey of 409 U.S. EV owners identifies five types of charging behaviors. • Regular public chargers are more common among renters with private parking. • Older, particularly female, EV drivers are less likely to use public charging. • All users desire accessible, reliable, and safe charging stations. • Preferences for speed, cost, waiting, ease, and proximity vary by charging behavior. Electric vehicles (EVs) have been promoted through policy and publicity as a solution for decarbonizing transport, with public charging stations (PCS) being crucial to support EV use. This study examines EV users’ PCS selection considerations and how they vary by existing charging behaviors. A survey of 409 U.S. EV owners (Dec 2023–Jan 2024) identified five user types with distinct charging behaviors using Hierarchical clustering: regular, range-anxious, functional, infrequent PCS users, and non-PCS users. Multinomial logistic regression linked user types primarily to gender, age, housing type, and parking type. Kano models further revealed that users of all types valued accessibility, reliability, and location safety, while differing priorities for charging speed, ease of use, amenity, waiting time and proximity. The findings offer valuable insights into PCS deployment and enhance EV user satisfaction, providing implications for policymakers, infrastructure developers, and future research to advance sustainable transport.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2025.105081
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Electric vehicle users’ charging patterns and selection considerations at public charging stations

Huizhong Guo, Kai Wu, Junhao Huang, Feng Zhou et al.
2 citations
Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
1.46
article

Electric vehicle users’ charging patterns and selection considerations at public charging stations

Huizhong Guo, Kai Wu, Junhao Huang, Feng Zhou, Shan Bao, Zhen Yu Hu, Dominique Meroux, Boyou Chen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• Survey of 409 U.S. EV owners identifies five types of charging behaviors. • Regular public chargers are more common among renters with private parking. • Older, particularly female, EV drivers are less likely to use public charging. • All users desire accessible, reliable, and safe charging stations. • Preferences for speed, cost, waiting, ease, and proximity vary by charging behavior. Electric vehicles (EVs) have been promoted through policy and publicity as a solution for decarbonizing transport, with public charging stations (PCS) being crucial to support EV use. This study examines EV users’ PCS selection considerations and how they vary by existing charging behaviors. A survey of 409 U.S. EV owners (Dec 2023–Jan 2024) identified five user types with distinct charging behaviors using Hierarchical clustering: regular, range-anxious, functional, infrequent PCS users, and non-PCS users. Multinomial logistic regression linked user types primarily to gender, age, housing type, and parking type. Kano models further revealed that users of all types valued accessibility, reliability, and location safety, while differing priorities for charging speed, ease of use, amenity, waiting time and proximity. The findings offer valuable insights into PCS deployment and enhance EV user satisfaction, providing implications for policymakers, infrastructure developers, and future research to advance sustainable transport.

Transportation Research Part D Transport and EnvironmentVol. 149
Ford Motor Company (United States) (US), Michigan Department of Transportation (US), University of Michigan (US), H.B. Fuller (United States) (US), Ford Motor Company (Czechia) (CZ), University of Michigan–Dearborn (US), Huron Gastro (US), Baxter (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
1.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.