Generative AI for Requirements Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review

ABSTRACT Introduction Requirements engineering (RE) faces challenges due to the handling of increasingly complex software systems. These challenges can be addressed using generative artificial intelligence (GenAI). Given that GenAI‐based RE has not been systematically analyzed in detail, this review examines the related research, focusing on trends, methodologies, challenges, and future work directions. Methods A systematic methodology for paper selection, data extraction, and feature analysis is used to comprehensively review 238 articles published from 2019 to 2025 and available from major academic databases. Results Although generative pretrained transformer models dominate current applications (67.3% of studies), the research focus remains unevenly distributed across RE phases, with analysis (30.0%) and elicitation (22.1%) receiving the most attention and management (6.8%) remaining underexplored. Three core challenges—reproducibility (66.8%), hallucinations (63.4%), and interpretability (57.1%)—form a tightly interlinked triad affecting trust and consistency, and strong correlations ( co‐occurrence) indicate that these challenges must be addressed holistically. Industrial adoption remains nascent, with > 90% of studies corresponding to early‐stage development and only 1.3% reaching production‐level integration. Evaluation practices show maturity gaps, limited tool/dataset availability, and fragmented benchmarking approaches. Conclusions Despite the transformative potential of GenAI‐based RE, several barriers hinder its practical adoption. The strong correlations among core challenges demand specialized architectures targeting interdependencies rather than isolated solutions. The limited real‐world deployment reflects systemic bottlenecks in generalizability, data quality, and scalable evaluation methods. Successful adoption requires coordinated development across technical robustness, methodological maturity, and governance integration. A multiphase research roadmap emphasizing evaluation infrastructure strengthening, governance‐aware development, and industrial‐scale standardization is proposed.