Analyzing greenhouse gas emissions from a multi-stage public swine manure-treatment facility in Korea: Comparison with 2019 Refinement of the IPCC-guidelines

Wastewater treatment facilities are major systems for managing swine manure in Korea. These facilities primarily use physical, chemical, and biological processes to remove harmful substances from manure and convert them into compost, liquid fertilizer or biogas. The 2050 carbon neutrality scenario in Korea aims to increase the proportion of manure purification treatment from 13% to 25% by 2030. As manure treatment facilities expand, it is crucial to quantify and monitor their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions such as methane (CH₄) and nitrous oxide (N₂O) gas emissions. This study aimed to measure the GHG emissions from a swine wastewater treatment plant to develop a country-specific emissions factor for each treatment stage to determine the national GHG inventory. The facility evaluated in this study had tanks for sedimentation, manure retention, denitrification, and aeration (nitrification) and treats 121 tonnes of swine manure from approximately 24,335 pigs. Quantification of the total GHG emissions from the facility was conducted for 24h once per a month, using a CH₄/N<sub>2</sub>O Analyzer. The total emission factors from this facility for CH₄ and N<sub>2</sub>O were estimated 0.59 kg CH₄/head/year and 0.004 kg N₂O/head/year. Also, field-measured data showed 417 tCO<sub>2</sub>-eq/year, whereas 2019 IPCC Tier 2 factors estimated 1,238 tCO<sub>2</sub>-eq/year- a 66% overestimate. The results revealed that the initial treatment stages (sedimentation and manure retention tanks) were the primary emission hotspots. This significant overestimation highlights the critical need for adopting refined specific emission factors based on direct field measurements. In conclusion, it is crucial to ensure that sedimentation and manure retention tanks are gastight to reduce the GHG emissions from a facility. Likewise, direct stage-resolved monitoring is essential to prevent overestimating GHG emissions. Therefore, this study serves as a foundation for the development of effective carbon reduction strategies in manure treatment processes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science and Technology
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2500258
Primary Topic
Odor and Emission Control Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing greenhouse gas emissions from a multi-stage public swine manure-treatment facility in Korea: Comparison with 2019 Refinement of the IPCC-guidelines

K. J. Park, Mohammad Ataallahi, Dongwoo Kim, Geun-Woo Park
Journal of Animal Science and Technology
Odor and Emission Control Technologies
article

Analyzing greenhouse gas emissions from a multi-stage public swine manure-treatment facility in Korea: Comparison with 2019 Refinement of the IPCC-guidelines

K. J. Park, Mohammad Ataallahi, Dongwoo Kim, Geun-Woo Park
article en

Abstract

Wastewater treatment facilities are major systems for managing swine manure in Korea. These facilities primarily use physical, chemical, and biological processes to remove harmful substances from manure and convert them into compost, liquid fertilizer or biogas. The 2050 carbon neutrality scenario in Korea aims to increase the proportion of manure purification treatment from 13% to 25% by 2030. As manure treatment facilities expand, it is crucial to quantify and monitor their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions such as methane (CH₄) and nitrous oxide (N₂O) gas emissions. This study aimed to measure the GHG emissions from a swine wastewater treatment plant to develop a country-specific emissions factor for each treatment stage to determine the national GHG inventory. The facility evaluated in this study had tanks for sedimentation, manure retention, denitrification, and aeration (nitrification) and treats 121 tonnes of swine manure from approximately 24,335 pigs. Quantification of the total GHG emissions from the facility was conducted for 24h once per a month, using a CH₄/N<sub>2</sub>O Analyzer. The total emission factors from this facility for CH₄ and N<sub>2</sub>O were estimated 0.59 kg CH₄/head/year and 0.004 kg N₂O/head/year. Also, field-measured data showed 417 tCO<sub>2</sub>-eq/year, whereas 2019 IPCC Tier 2 factors estimated 1,238 tCO<sub>2</sub>-eq/year- a 66% overestimate. The results revealed that the initial treatment stages (sedimentation and manure retention tanks) were the primary emission hotspots. This significant overestimation highlights the critical need for adopting refined specific emission factors based on direct field measurements. In conclusion, it is crucial to ensure that sedimentation and manure retention tanks are gastight to reduce the GHG emissions from a facility. Likewise, direct stage-resolved monitoring is essential to prevent overestimating GHG emissions. Therefore, this study serves as a foundation for the development of effective carbon reduction strategies in manure treatment processes.

Journal of Animal Science and Technology
Rural Development Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Odor and Emission Control Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.