Life cycle carbon impacts of thermal mass and ground coupling in residential buildings

Decarbonising housing requires life-cycle assessments that reflect shifting climate and power-sector trajectories. This study evaluates two full-scale, equal-use dwellings with contrasting thermal configurations: a medium-weight masonry structure directly coupled to the ground (B1) and a lightweight timber-frame on a fully insulated slab-on-ground (B2). A cradle-to-grave, 75-year assessment (2026–2100) integrates three SSP pathways, embodied emissions (A1–A3), operational heating and cooling (B6), and end-of-life (C1–C4). Empirical multi-season monitoring anchors operational baselines; electricity carbon intensity declines stepwise from 400 to 200 to 100 g CO 2 ·kWh −1 across three 25-year periods. Results show that B2's initial heating advantage diminishes as cooling demand rises under warming. By 2100, B1 exhibits consistently lower cradle-to-grave emissions, averaging 7.07 kg CO 2 ·m −2 ·yr −1 compared with 8.15 kg CO 2 ·m −2 ·yr −1 for B2, an ≈8 % reduction. While grid decarbonisation reduces operational burdens for both, thermal mass and ground coupling provide additional resilience, preventing overheating without mechanical cooling in the experimental test bed. • Prospective 75-year LCA anchored in full-scale monitoring. •Thermal mass + ground coupling cut life-cycle CO 2 by ∼8 % vs. lightweight. •Heating gains of insulated slab are erased by rising cooling demand. •No-AC overheating eliminated in B1; B2 requires AC under warming. •Under S1–LOW neutrality, break-even ∼15–16 years; ranking unchanged.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Energy
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.139142
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life cycle carbon impacts of thermal mass and ground coupling in residential buildings

Anna Staszczuk, Marta Gortych, Tadeusz Kuczyński
1 citations
Energy
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
0.80
article

Life cycle carbon impacts of thermal mass and ground coupling in residential buildings

Anna Staszczuk, Marta Gortych, Tadeusz Kuczyński
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Decarbonising housing requires life-cycle assessments that reflect shifting climate and power-sector trajectories. This study evaluates two full-scale, equal-use dwellings with contrasting thermal configurations: a medium-weight masonry structure directly coupled to the ground (B1) and a lightweight timber-frame on a fully insulated slab-on-ground (B2). A cradle-to-grave, 75-year assessment (2026–2100) integrates three SSP pathways, embodied emissions (A1–A3), operational heating and cooling (B6), and end-of-life (C1–C4). Empirical multi-season monitoring anchors operational baselines; electricity carbon intensity declines stepwise from 400 to 200 to 100 g CO 2 ·kWh −1 across three 25-year periods. Results show that B2's initial heating advantage diminishes as cooling demand rises under warming. By 2100, B1 exhibits consistently lower cradle-to-grave emissions, averaging 7.07 kg CO 2 ·m −2 ·yr −1 compared with 8.15 kg CO 2 ·m −2 ·yr −1 for B2, an ≈8 % reduction. While grid decarbonisation reduces operational burdens for both, thermal mass and ground coupling provide additional resilience, preventing overheating without mechanical cooling in the experimental test bed. • Prospective 75-year LCA anchored in full-scale monitoring. •Thermal mass + ground coupling cut life-cycle CO 2 by ∼8 % vs. lightweight. •Heating gains of insulated slab are erased by rising cooling demand. •No-AC overheating eliminated in B1; B2 requires AC under warming. •Under S1–LOW neutrality, break-even ∼15–16 years; ranking unchanged.

EnergyVol. 340
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.