Pedagogical translanguaging written feedback in EFL academic writing

Abstract Research has increasingly documented the contribution of translanguaging in pedagogical practices. Recently this has been extended to the use of translanguaging in the provision of oral corrective feedback. However, while the use of translanguaging has been supported in second language writing, little research has considered whether translanguaging can support learning in second language written feedback (WF). The goal of the current study is to determine whether translanguaging feedback increases revision between drafts in an academic writing context. A total of 23 Saudi EFL university students participated in the current study. Using a counterbalanced design, participants were divided into two groups and provided with two text prompts. Following each text, the participants received translanguaging or English-Only WF. Feedback targets included discourse, grammatical and lexical accuracy, content, and mechanics. The quantitative findings revealed that translanguaging WF significantly impacted learners’ revisions in the second drafts, leading to nearly twice the amount of revision compared to English-Only feedback. While the qualitative results indicated that learners perceived both conditions as effective, translanguaging feedback was rated as more effective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Linguistics Review
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2025-0026
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pedagogical translanguaging written feedback in EFL academic writing

Rebecca Adams, Bakheet Almatrafi
Applied Linguistics Review
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

Pedagogical translanguaging written feedback in EFL academic writing

Rebecca Adams, Bakheet Almatrafi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Research has increasingly documented the contribution of translanguaging in pedagogical practices. Recently this has been extended to the use of translanguaging in the provision of oral corrective feedback. However, while the use of translanguaging has been supported in second language writing, little research has considered whether translanguaging can support learning in second language written feedback (WF). The goal of the current study is to determine whether translanguaging feedback increases revision between drafts in an academic writing context. A total of 23 Saudi EFL university students participated in the current study. Using a counterbalanced design, participants were divided into two groups and provided with two text prompts. Following each text, the participants received translanguaging or English-Only WF. Feedback targets included discourse, grammatical and lexical accuracy, content, and mechanics. The quantitative findings revealed that translanguaging WF significantly impacted learners’ revisions in the second drafts, leading to nearly twice the amount of revision compared to English-Only feedback. While the qualitative results indicated that learners perceived both conditions as effective, translanguaging feedback was rated as more effective.

Applied Linguistics ReviewVol. 17(1)
Umm al-Qura University (SA), University of Memphis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.