Geopotential-number estimation based on regional and global geoid models towards vertical datum modernization in India

Abstract This study focuses on the analysis of the dataset currently available over the Indian subcontinent for the calculation of geopotential numbers and orthometric heights, mainly the performance of regional and global geoid models across diverse topographic conditions. Using Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) observations from 17 Asia Pacific Regional Geodetic Project (APRGP) stations distributed across plains, plateaus, coastal areas, and complex mountainous regions, we compared six geoid models: three global (EIGEN-6C4, xGM2019e_2159, SGG-UGM-2) and three regionals (IndGG-SH2021, IndGG-CUT2021, and IndGG-LSMSA2021). Interpolated gravity values, geoidal heights, and geodetic coordinates were utilized to derive geopotential numbers, which were further analyzed to estimate orthometric heights and quantify the discrepancies obtained using currently available data. Our results indicate that recent global geoid models, particularly XGM2019e_2159 and SGG-UGM-2, have improved and have consistency with respect to regional geoid models, mainly with IndGG-SH2021 in terms of accuracy and reliability. Stations located in moderate terrain zones such as Bangalore, Delhi, and Hyderabad showed minimal variations (<±15 cm) in orthometric heights, However, significant discrepancies were observed in mountainous regions like Kashmir, where orthometric height differences exceeded ±25 cm, especially with the IndGG-CUT2021 model. Based on these findings, it is strongly recommended to use gravimetric geoid models derived from satellite missions to analyze the strength of regional models that allow to observation of the trend of the results in each model to verify its consistency. Furthermore, obtain absolute gravity data for India’s vertical datum modernization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Geodesy
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2025-0050
Primary Topic
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geopotential-number estimation based on regional and global geoid models towards vertical datum modernization in India

Karan Nayak, Aníbal I. Arana Medina, Manuel Trejo-Echeagaray, Ana Isela Vidal-Vega et al.
Journal of Applied Geodesy
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
article

Geopotential-number estimation based on regional and global geoid models towards vertical datum modernization in India

Karan Nayak, Aníbal I. Arana Medina, Manuel Trejo-Echeagaray, Ana Isela Vidal-Vega, Manuel E. Trejo-Soto, Tiojari D. Guzman Galindo
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study focuses on the analysis of the dataset currently available over the Indian subcontinent for the calculation of geopotential numbers and orthometric heights, mainly the performance of regional and global geoid models across diverse topographic conditions. Using Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) observations from 17 Asia Pacific Regional Geodetic Project (APRGP) stations distributed across plains, plateaus, coastal areas, and complex mountainous regions, we compared six geoid models: three global (EIGEN-6C4, xGM2019e_2159, SGG-UGM-2) and three regionals (IndGG-SH2021, IndGG-CUT2021, and IndGG-LSMSA2021). Interpolated gravity values, geoidal heights, and geodetic coordinates were utilized to derive geopotential numbers, which were further analyzed to estimate orthometric heights and quantify the discrepancies obtained using currently available data. Our results indicate that recent global geoid models, particularly XGM2019e_2159 and SGG-UGM-2, have improved and have consistency with respect to regional geoid models, mainly with IndGG-SH2021 in terms of accuracy and reliability. Stations located in moderate terrain zones such as Bangalore, Delhi, and Hyderabad showed minimal variations (<±15 cm) in orthometric heights, However, significant discrepancies were observed in mountainous regions like Kashmir, where orthometric height differences exceeded ±25 cm, especially with the IndGG-CUT2021 model. Based on these findings, it is strongly recommended to use gravimetric geoid models derived from satellite missions to analyze the strength of regional models that allow to observation of the trend of the results in each model to verify its consistency. Furthermore, obtain absolute gravity data for India’s vertical datum modernization.

Journal of Applied Geodesy
Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa (MX), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.