Edith Wharton’s <i>A Motor-Flight through France</i> and the Aesthetics of Wonder

Abstract Toward the end of her life, Edith Wharton described herself as “an incorrigible life-lover &amp; life-wonderer.” This article contends that wonder is a crucial mechanism in how Wharton responds to aesthetic artifacts. Through a detailed analysis of her response to Amiens Cathedral in A Motor-Flight through France, this article illustrates how Wharton adopts and advocates what Philip Fisher calls an “aesthetics of wonder”—an interpretive stance wherein the intellect’s drive to know a work of visual art is inaugurated and sustained by Cartesian wonder. Such a stance allows analysis to unfold, nourished by specialist knowledge, without banishing emotion and sensation. Taking her response to Amiens as paradigmatic, I also address how similar dynamics mark her responses to Bourges, Beauvais, and Rheims in Motor-Flight, while noting important parallels between Wharton’s approach to aesthetics and the ideas of John Addington Symonds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Edith Wharton Review
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5325/editwharrevi.41.2.0107
Primary Topic
American and British Literature Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Edith Wharton’s A Motor-Flight through France and the Aesthetics of Wonder

Allyson Stack
Edith Wharton Review
American and British Literature Analysis
article

Edith Wharton’s A Motor-Flight through France and the Aesthetics of Wonder

Allyson Stack
article en

Abstract

Abstract Toward the end of her life, Edith Wharton described herself as “an incorrigible life-lover &amp; life-wonderer.” This article contends that wonder is a crucial mechanism in how Wharton responds to aesthetic artifacts. Through a detailed analysis of her response to Amiens Cathedral in A Motor-Flight through France, this article illustrates how Wharton adopts and advocates what Philip Fisher calls an “aesthetics of wonder”—an interpretive stance wherein the intellect’s drive to know a work of visual art is inaugurated and sustained by Cartesian wonder. Such a stance allows analysis to unfold, nourished by specialist knowledge, without banishing emotion and sensation. Taking her response to Amiens as paradigmatic, I also address how similar dynamics mark her responses to Bourges, Beauvais, and Rheims in Motor-Flight, while noting important parallels between Wharton’s approach to aesthetics and the ideas of John Addington Symonds.

Edith Wharton ReviewVol. 41(2)
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
American and British Literature Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Edith Wharton’s <i>A Motor-Flight through France</i> and the Aesthetics of Wonder — Allyson Stack · Edith Wharton Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS