Exploring university educators’ readiness for changing to PBL: a case from India

Educators’ change readiness is crucial for successful transitions to active learning. This study solicits the perspectives of 33 educators from HITAM, an autonomous Indian engineering college, on their readiness for such a transition under a PBL-focused institutional initiative. Q methodology yields four viewpoints, respectively prioritizing: 1) initial positive experiences with new teaching designs; 2) improved student learning outcomes; 3) contextual support for educational changes, and 4) alignment between institutional and individual readiness. While all groups acknowledge both the necessity of institutional support and the societal trends favoring PBL, they differ in their priorities and motivations for educational change. These findings emphasize the need for institutions to provide diverse resources to support educators’ change readiness and practices, foster a culture of innovation, and meet evolving educational demands.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal for Academic Development
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144x.2025.2574982
Primary Topic
Q Methodology Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring university educators’ readiness for changing to PBL: a case from India

Xiangyun Du, Juebei Chen, Aida Guerra, Surendra Bandi et al.
The International Journal for Academic Development
Q Methodology Applications
article

Exploring university educators’ readiness for changing to PBL: a case from India

Xiangyun Du, Juebei Chen, Aida Guerra, Surendra Bandi, Søren Hansen, Gopalkrishna Joshi
article en

Abstract

Educators’ change readiness is crucial for successful transitions to active learning. This study solicits the perspectives of 33 educators from HITAM, an autonomous Indian engineering college, on their readiness for such a transition under a PBL-focused institutional initiative. Q methodology yields four viewpoints, respectively prioritizing: 1) initial positive experiences with new teaching designs; 2) improved student learning outcomes; 3) contextual support for educational changes, and 4) alignment between institutional and individual readiness. While all groups acknowledge both the necessity of institutional support and the societal trends favoring PBL, they differ in their priorities and motivations for educational change. These findings emphasize the need for institutions to provide diverse resources to support educators’ change readiness and practices, foster a culture of innovation, and meet evolving educational demands.

The International Journal for Academic Development
Solapur University (IN), Birla Institute of Technology and Science - Hyderabad Campus (IN), Aalborg University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Q Methodology Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.