Effects of Deep Learning Bias Correction and Carbon Neutrality on Projections of Future Population Exposure to Extreme Precipitation

ABSTRACT Spatiotemporal variations in extreme precipitation and their impacts on population exposure remain poorly understood due to biases in climate model projections and assumptions inherent in emission scenarios. In this study, we evaluate the bias‐correction performance of three deep learning techniques—Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Long Short‐Term Memory networks (LSTM), and hybrid CNN‐LSTM—using extreme precipitation indices derived from 10 Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) models. Building on this, we assess exposure for China's nine river basins under Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP)1–2.6 and SSP3–7.0 in the near future (2031–2060) and far future (2071–2100) and quantify the potential benefits of achieving carbon neutrality on reducing population exposure to extreme precipitation. Our findings reveal that CNN outperforms both LSTM and CNN‐LSTM in correcting biases. Compared to the historical period (1985–2014), both R95p and Rx1day exhibit increasing trends across China at the scenario and temporal levels. The SSP3–7.0 scenario shows more pronounced increases than SSP1–2.6, and the long‐term trends (2071–2100) are greater than those observed in the short‐term period (2031–2060). Spatially, the strongest responses are observed in the southwest and southeast coastal regions, while changes in inland areas are more moderate. On the exposure side, SSP3–7.0 results in a substantial national increase, with far‐future exposure projected to reach approximately 2.7 times the near‐future levels for Rx1day and 1.2 times for R95p. Hotspot areas of exposure are found along the Yangtze–Pearl River Delta–Southeast coastal belt, the southwestern uplands, and the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei–Bohai corridor. In contrast, the carbon‐neutral pathway (SSP1–2.6) leads to approximately 80% reductions in national exposure in the far future, with reductions greater than 70% in all nine basins. We suggest that climate extreme changes, rather than population dynamics or extreme‐population interactions, are anticipated to dominate these reductions in the future. These results provide important scientific support for ongoing efforts aimed at achieving carbon neutrality by the 2060s to reduce the potential risk of extreme precipitation in China and its nine major river basins.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Climatology
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.70174
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Deep Learning Bias Correction and Carbon Neutrality on Projections of Future Population Exposure to Extreme Precipitation

Hongwei Cao, Lei Wu, Wenbin Wang, Xiaohua Xiang et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Climatology
Climate variability and models
1.11
article

Effects of Deep Learning Bias Correction and Carbon Neutrality on Projections of Future Population Exposure to Extreme Precipitation

Hongwei Cao, Lei Wu, Wenbin Wang, Xiaohua Xiang, Xiaoling Wu, Xian Lin, Adnan Rajib, Zhu Liu, Yuan Liu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Spatiotemporal variations in extreme precipitation and their impacts on population exposure remain poorly understood due to biases in climate model projections and assumptions inherent in emission scenarios. In this study, we evaluate the bias‐correction performance of three deep learning techniques—Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Long Short‐Term Memory networks (LSTM), and hybrid CNN‐LSTM—using extreme precipitation indices derived from 10 Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) models. Building on this, we assess exposure for China's nine river basins under Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP)1–2.6 and SSP3–7.0 in the near future (2031–2060) and far future (2071–2100) and quantify the potential benefits of achieving carbon neutrality on reducing population exposure to extreme precipitation. Our findings reveal that CNN outperforms both LSTM and CNN‐LSTM in correcting biases. Compared to the historical period (1985–2014), both R95p and Rx1day exhibit increasing trends across China at the scenario and temporal levels. The SSP3–7.0 scenario shows more pronounced increases than SSP1–2.6, and the long‐term trends (2071–2100) are greater than those observed in the short‐term period (2031–2060). Spatially, the strongest responses are observed in the southwest and southeast coastal regions, while changes in inland areas are more moderate. On the exposure side, SSP3–7.0 results in a substantial national increase, with far‐future exposure projected to reach approximately 2.7 times the near‐future levels for Rx1day and 1.2 times for R95p. Hotspot areas of exposure are found along the Yangtze–Pearl River Delta–Southeast coastal belt, the southwestern uplands, and the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei–Bohai corridor. In contrast, the carbon‐neutral pathway (SSP1–2.6) leads to approximately 80% reductions in national exposure in the far future, with reductions greater than 70% in all nine basins. We suggest that climate extreme changes, rather than population dynamics or extreme‐population interactions, are anticipated to dominate these reductions in the future. These results provide important scientific support for ongoing efforts aimed at achieving carbon neutrality by the 2060s to reduce the potential risk of extreme precipitation in China and its nine major river basins.

International Journal of ClimatologyVol. 46(1)
China Meteorological Administration (CN), Hohai University (CN), Nanjing Water Conservancy Planning & Design Institute (China) (CN), Yangtze River Pharmaceutical Group (China) (CN), Institute of Hydrobiology, Biology Centre, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Climate variability and models
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.