Testing-in-the-wild: Innovation nationalism and the colonial dynamics of new technology testbeds

This article examines the phenomenon of the AI testbed and practices of testing-in-the-wild. It combines historical and sociological approaches to understand how the settler-colony of Australia has come to be treated as an ideal test site, using commercial drone delivery company Wing Aviation as a case study. It connects the figuration of Australia as contemporary testbed with histories of the nation as a colonial experiment. I argue that this historical frame has been consistently deployed to justify the treatment of lands and peoples as experimental subjects across a range of domains—from medical science, penal management, and military operations. In doing so, I show how Australia has been treated as a test site and Australians as test subjects based on changing imaginaries of the nation and its people—from proxies for whiteness and Empire in the colonial period, to multiculturalism and ethnic diversity in the contemporary era.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dialogues on Digital Society
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/29768640251392332
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Australian History and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing-in-the-wild: Innovation nationalism and the colonial dynamics of new technology testbeds

Thao Phan
1 citations
Dialogues on Digital Society
Australian History and Society
4.20
article

Testing-in-the-wild: Innovation nationalism and the colonial dynamics of new technology testbeds

Thao Phan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article examines the phenomenon of the AI testbed and practices of testing-in-the-wild. It combines historical and sociological approaches to understand how the settler-colony of Australia has come to be treated as an ideal test site, using commercial drone delivery company Wing Aviation as a case study. It connects the figuration of Australia as contemporary testbed with histories of the nation as a colonial experiment. I argue that this historical frame has been consistently deployed to justify the treatment of lands and peoples as experimental subjects across a range of domains—from medical science, penal management, and military operations. In doing so, I show how Australia has been treated as a test site and Australians as test subjects based on changing imaginaries of the nation and its people—from proxies for whiteness and Empire in the colonial period, to multiculturalism and ethnic diversity in the contemporary era.

Dialogues on Digital Society
Australian National University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Australian History and Society
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.