Computing Proximity Operators of Scale and Signed Permutation Invariant Functions

Abstract This paper investigates the computation of proximity operators for scale and signed permutation invariant functions. A scale invariant function remains unchanged under uniform scaling, while a signed permutation invariant function retains its structure despite permutations and sign changes applied to its input variables. Noteworthy examples include the $$\ell _0$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ℓ</mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:math> function, the ratio of $$\ell _1/\ell _2$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ℓ</mml:mi> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ℓ</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , and its square, with their proximity operators being particularly crucial in sparse signal recovery. We delve into the properties of scale and signed permutation invariant functions, delineating the computation of their proximity operators into three sequential steps: the $${\varvec{w}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>w</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> -step, r -step, and d -step. These steps collectively form a procedure termed as WRD, with the $${\varvec{w}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>w</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> -step being of utmost importance and requiring careful treatment. Leveraging this procedure, we present a method for explicitly and efficiently computing the proximity operator of $$(\ell _1/\ell _2)^2$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ℓ</mml:mi> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ℓ</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:math> and introduce an algorithm for the proximity operator of $$\ell _1/\ell _2$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ℓ</mml:mi> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ℓ</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . Numerical experiments on sparse signal recovery corroborate the analysis and show that first-order methods equipped with these proximity operators outperform $$\ell _1$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ℓ</mml:mi> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:math> -based baselines in reconstruction accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-025-02871-6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computing Proximity Operators of Scale and Signed Permutation Invariant Functions

Ashley Prater-Bennette, Lixin Shen, Jianqing Jia
1 citations
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications
Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
1.33
article

Computing Proximity Operators of Scale and Signed Permutation Invariant Functions

Ashley Prater-Bennette, Lixin Shen, Jianqing Jia
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper investigates the computation of proximity operators for scale and signed permutation invariant functions. A scale invariant function remains unchanged under uniform scaling, while a signed permutation invariant function retains its structure despite permutations and sign changes applied to its input variables. Noteworthy examples include the $$\ell _0$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ℓ</mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:math> function, the ratio of $$\ell _1/\ell _2$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ℓ</mml:mi> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ℓ</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , and its square, with their proximity operators being particularly crucial in sparse signal recovery. We delve into the properties of scale and signed permutation invariant functions, delineating the computation of their proximity operators into three sequential steps: the $${\varvec{w}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>w</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> -step, r -step, and d -step. These steps collectively form a procedure termed as WRD, with the $${\varvec{w}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>w</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> -step being of utmost importance and requiring careful treatment. Leveraging this procedure, we present a method for explicitly and efficiently computing the proximity operator of $$(\ell _1/\ell _2)^2$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ℓ</mml:mi> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ℓ</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:math> and introduce an algorithm for the proximity operator of $$\ell _1/\ell _2$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ℓ</mml:mi> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ℓ</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . Numerical experiments on sparse signal recovery corroborate the analysis and show that first-order methods equipped with these proximity operators outperform $$\ell _1$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ℓ</mml:mi> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:math> -based baselines in reconstruction accuracy.

Journal of Optimization Theory and ApplicationsVol. 208(1)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), United States Air Force Research Laboratory (US), Syracuse University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
1.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.