From global to local: how local actors and networks shape global refugee protection norms in Brazil, Bangladesh, and Turkey

How and why are global norms ‘localised’? Existing studies suggest that the ‘localisation’ process can lead to different outcomes (adoption, rejection, adaptation, resistance) and that such process is driven by structural and institutional factors or the activities of ‘globalizing actors’. Complementing these works, we generate a new explanation, according to which the outcomes of the localisation process can be also powerfully mediated by the operation and organization of domestic governance systems and domestic governance actors’ understandings of global norms. To illustrate this claim we adopt a ‘macro–micro-macro’ approach to study the ‘heuristic case’ of the localisation of global norms on refugee protection in Bangladesh, Brazil and Turkey, three countries where, despite similar exposure to refugee flows and presence of globalizing actors, the localisation process led to very different outcomes. To do so, we apply qualitative content analysis and qualitative social network analysis elaborating original data collected in the three countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Globalizations
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2025.2573515
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From global to local: how local actors and networks shape global refugee protection norms in Brazil, Bangladesh, and Turkey

Andrea Pettrachin, Andrew Geddes, Leiza Brumat
Globalizations
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
article

From global to local: how local actors and networks shape global refugee protection norms in Brazil, Bangladesh, and Turkey

Andrea Pettrachin, Andrew Geddes, Leiza Brumat
article en

Abstract

How and why are global norms ‘localised’? Existing studies suggest that the ‘localisation’ process can lead to different outcomes (adoption, rejection, adaptation, resistance) and that such process is driven by structural and institutional factors or the activities of ‘globalizing actors’. Complementing these works, we generate a new explanation, according to which the outcomes of the localisation process can be also powerfully mediated by the operation and organization of domestic governance systems and domestic governance actors’ understandings of global norms. To illustrate this claim we adopt a ‘macro–micro-macro’ approach to study the ‘heuristic case’ of the localisation of global norms on refugee protection in Bangladesh, Brazil and Turkey, three countries where, despite similar exposure to refugee flows and presence of globalizing actors, the localisation process led to very different outcomes. To do so, we apply qualitative content analysis and qualitative social network analysis elaborating original data collected in the three countries.

GlobalizationsVol. 23(3)
United Nations University Institute on Comparative Regional Integration Studies (BE), University of Padua (IT), European University Institute (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From global to local: how local actors and networks shape global refugee protection norms in Brazil, Bangladesh, and Turkey — Andrea Pettrachin, Andrew Geddes, et al. · Globalizations (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS