Modeling tumor dynamics and predicting response to therapies in a murine pancreatic cancer model

We seek to establish a parsimonious mathematical framework for understanding the interaction and dynamics of the response of pancreatic cancer to the NGC triple chemotherapy regimen (mNab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and cisplatin), stromal-targeting drugs (calcipotriol and losartan), and an immune checkpoint inhibitor (anti-PD-L1). We developed a set of ordinary differential equations describing changes in tumor size under the influence of cocktails of treatments. Parameter estimation relies on three tumor volume measurements obtained over a 14-day period in a genetically engineered pancreatic cancer model ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> <mml:mi>a</mml:mi> <mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mstyle><mml:mi>L</mml:mi> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:mstyle> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mstyle><mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mn>12</mml:mn> <mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mstyle> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:mo>;</mml:mo> <mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:mn>53</mml:mn></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mstyle><mml:mi>L</mml:mi> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:mstyle> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mstyle><mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mn>172</mml:mn> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mstyle> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:mo>;</mml:mo> <mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mstyle><mml:mi>C</mml:mi> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> <mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mstyle> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ). Our model reproduces tumor growth in all scenarios with an average concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) of 0.99 ± 0.01. We conduct leave-one-out predictions (average CCC = 0.74 ± 0.06), mouse-specific predictions (average CCC = 0.75 ± 0.02), and hybrid, group-informed, mouse-specific predictions (average CCC = 0.85 ± 0.04). The developed mathematical model demonstrates high accuracy in fitting the experimental tumor data and a robust ability to predict tumor response to treatment. This approach has important implications for optimizing combination NGC treatment strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Systems Biology and Applications
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41540-025-00593-z
Primary Topic
Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling tumor dynamics and predicting response to therapies in a murine pancreatic cancer model

Anna G. Sorace, Thomas E. Yankeelov, Mamta Gupta, Ernesto A. B. F. Lima et al.
npj Systems Biology and Applications
Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
article

Modeling tumor dynamics and predicting response to therapies in a murine pancreatic cancer model

Anna G. Sorace, Thomas E. Yankeelov, Mamta Gupta, Ernesto A. B. F. Lima, Rong Zhou, Krithik Vishwanath, Hoon Choi
article en

Abstract

We seek to establish a parsimonious mathematical framework for understanding the interaction and dynamics of the response of pancreatic cancer to the NGC triple chemotherapy regimen (mNab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and cisplatin), stromal-targeting drugs (calcipotriol and losartan), and an immune checkpoint inhibitor (anti-PD-L1). We developed a set of ordinary differential equations describing changes in tumor size under the influence of cocktails of treatments. Parameter estimation relies on three tumor volume measurements obtained over a 14-day period in a genetically engineered pancreatic cancer model ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> <mml:mi>a</mml:mi> <mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mstyle><mml:mi>L</mml:mi> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:mstyle> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mstyle><mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mn>12</mml:mn> <mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mstyle> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:mo>;</mml:mo> <mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:mn>53</mml:mn></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mstyle><mml:mi>L</mml:mi> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:mstyle> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mstyle><mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mn>172</mml:mn> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mstyle> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:mo>;</mml:mo> <mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mstyle><mml:mi>C</mml:mi> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> <mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mstyle> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ). Our model reproduces tumor growth in all scenarios with an average concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) of 0.99 ± 0.01. We conduct leave-one-out predictions (average CCC = 0.74 ± 0.06), mouse-specific predictions (average CCC = 0.75 ± 0.02), and hybrid, group-informed, mouse-specific predictions (average CCC = 0.85 ± 0.04). The developed mathematical model demonstrates high accuracy in fitting the experimental tumor data and a robust ability to predict tumor response to treatment. This approach has important implications for optimizing combination NGC treatment strategies.

npj Systems Biology and ApplicationsVol. 11(1)
Livestrong Foundation (US), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), EarthTech International (United States) (US), Computing Center (RU), University of Pennsylvania (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.