Revealing interfacial failure mechanism of silicon based all solid state batteries via cryogenic electron microscopy
Interfaces are the critical components of all-solid-state batteries, and it is generally believed that high interfacial impedance is the major culprits of battery failure. In this study, the interface impedance has been found not to be a major issue in the batteries comprising Si negative electrode, Li<sub>10</sub>GeP<sub>2</sub>S<sub>12</sub> and Li<sub>10</sub>Si<sub>0.3</sub>PS<sub>6.7</sub>Cl<sub>1.8</sub> electrolytes and LiNi<sub>0.8</sub>Mn<sub>0.1</sub>Co<sub>0.1</sub>O<sub>2</sub> positive electrode. Instead, it is the sustainable interfacial reaction that depletes the active lithium source, causing continuous capacity decay. The interphase layer at the Si/Li<sub>10</sub>Si<sub>0.3</sub>PS<sub>6.7</sub>Cl<sub>1.8</sub> interface comprising nanocrystalline Li<sub>2</sub>S dispersed in an amorphous matrix is thin (with a thickness < 200 nm) and stable, and the battery maintains a good cyclability. In contrast, the interphase layer at the Si/Li<sub>10</sub>GeP<sub>2</sub>S<sub>12</sub> interface is thick with a thickness of 10 μm. Couter-intuitively, despite the thick interfacial layer comprising mainly needle shaped Li<sub>2</sub>S, the interfacial impedance does not increase dramatically, suggesting that interfacial impedance is not the main issue, rather, it is the chemically/electrochemically continuous reaction of negative electrode with Li<sub>10</sub>GeP<sub>2</sub>S<sub>12</sub> that consumes the active lithium source from positive electrode and causes the capacity decay. This study provides atomic-scale interface structures of sulfide based batteries, which have important implications for the design of stable interfaces for high performance batteries.
Authors
- Yongfu Tang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6318-3110)
- Jingming Yao
- Zhangran Ye
- Jitong Yan
- Qiushi Dai
- Jun Ma (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5016-8096)
- Zhixuan Yu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3065-6962)
- Zaifa Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8270-7943)
- Yong Su (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1964-0756)
- Jingzhao Chen
- Congcong Du (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2859-9601)
- Hongjun Ye (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6243-3237)
- Dingding Zhu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9473-1660)
- Ziang Guo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8953-0205)
- Zhaoyu Rong
- Xuedong Zhang
- Qiang Yu
- Zhenyu Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1555-5346)
- Jun Zhao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6190-0469)
- Hui Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3494-4419)
- Jianyu Huang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8424-5368)
- Hailong Qiu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2211-6464)
- Lingyun Zhu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8137-8715)
Institutions
- Anhui University (CN)
- Nankai University (CN)
- Yanshan University (CN)
- Guilin Electrical Equipment Research Institute (CN)
- Xiangtan University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2025-11-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-64697-0
- Citations
- 6
- Primary Topic
- Advancements in Battery Materials
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.38
Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province
- Yanshan University