Revealing interfacial failure mechanism of silicon based all solid state batteries via cryogenic electron microscopy

Interfaces are the critical components of all-solid-state batteries, and it is generally believed that high interfacial impedance is the major culprits of battery failure. In this study, the interface impedance has been found not to be a major issue in the batteries comprising Si negative electrode, Li<sub>10</sub>GeP<sub>2</sub>S<sub>12</sub> and Li<sub>10</sub>Si<sub>0.3</sub>PS<sub>6.7</sub>Cl<sub>1.8</sub> electrolytes and LiNi<sub>0.8</sub>Mn<sub>0.1</sub>Co<sub>0.1</sub>O<sub>2</sub> positive electrode. Instead, it is the sustainable interfacial reaction that depletes the active lithium source, causing continuous capacity decay. The interphase layer at the Si/Li<sub>10</sub>Si<sub>0.3</sub>PS<sub>6.7</sub>Cl<sub>1.8</sub> interface comprising nanocrystalline Li<sub>2</sub>S dispersed in an amorphous matrix is thin (with a thickness < 200 nm) and stable, and the battery maintains a good cyclability. In contrast, the interphase layer at the Si/Li<sub>10</sub>GeP<sub>2</sub>S<sub>12</sub> interface is thick with a thickness of 10 μm. Couter-intuitively, despite the thick interfacial layer comprising mainly needle shaped Li<sub>2</sub>S, the interfacial impedance does not increase dramatically, suggesting that interfacial impedance is not the main issue, rather, it is the chemically/electrochemically continuous reaction of negative electrode with Li<sub>10</sub>GeP<sub>2</sub>S<sub>12</sub> that consumes the active lithium source from positive electrode and causes the capacity decay. This study provides atomic-scale interface structures of sulfide based batteries, which have important implications for the design of stable interfaces for high performance batteries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-64697-0
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Advancements in Battery Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.38

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revealing interfacial failure mechanism of silicon based all solid state batteries via cryogenic electron microscopy

Yongfu Tang, Jingming Yao, Zhangran Ye, Jitong Yan et al.
6 citations
Nature Communications
Advancements in Battery Materials
4.38
article

Revealing interfacial failure mechanism of silicon based all solid state batteries via cryogenic electron microscopy

Yongfu Tang, Jingming Yao, Zhangran Ye, Jitong Yan, Qiushi Dai, Jun Ma, Zhixuan Yu, Zaifa Wang, Yong Su, Jingzhao Chen, Congcong Du, Hongjun Ye, Dingding Zhu, Ziang Guo, Zhaoyu Rong, Xuedong Zhang, Qiang Yu, Zhenyu Wang, Jun Zhao, Hui Li, Jianyu Huang, Hailong Qiu, Lingyun Zhu
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Interfaces are the critical components of all-solid-state batteries, and it is generally believed that high interfacial impedance is the major culprits of battery failure. In this study, the interface impedance has been found not to be a major issue in the batteries comprising Si negative electrode, Li<sub>10</sub>GeP<sub>2</sub>S<sub>12</sub> and Li<sub>10</sub>Si<sub>0.3</sub>PS<sub>6.7</sub>Cl<sub>1.8</sub> electrolytes and LiNi<sub>0.8</sub>Mn<sub>0.1</sub>Co<sub>0.1</sub>O<sub>2</sub> positive electrode. Instead, it is the sustainable interfacial reaction that depletes the active lithium source, causing continuous capacity decay. The interphase layer at the Si/Li<sub>10</sub>Si<sub>0.3</sub>PS<sub>6.7</sub>Cl<sub>1.8</sub> interface comprising nanocrystalline Li<sub>2</sub>S dispersed in an amorphous matrix is thin (with a thickness < 200 nm) and stable, and the battery maintains a good cyclability. In contrast, the interphase layer at the Si/Li<sub>10</sub>GeP<sub>2</sub>S<sub>12</sub> interface is thick with a thickness of 10 μm. Couter-intuitively, despite the thick interfacial layer comprising mainly needle shaped Li<sub>2</sub>S, the interfacial impedance does not increase dramatically, suggesting that interfacial impedance is not the main issue, rather, it is the chemically/electrochemically continuous reaction of negative electrode with Li<sub>10</sub>GeP<sub>2</sub>S<sub>12</sub> that consumes the active lithium source from positive electrode and causes the capacity decay. This study provides atomic-scale interface structures of sulfide based batteries, which have important implications for the design of stable interfaces for high performance batteries.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 16(1)
Anhui University (CN), Nankai University (CN), Yanshan University (CN), Guilin Electrical Equipment Research Institute (CN), Xiangtan University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province, Yanshan University
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Advancements in Battery Materials
4.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.