Self-efficacy and Perceived Obstacles to Return to Work After Solid Organ Transplantation: Validation of a Tool and Assessment of its Predictive Value for Kidney Transplant Recipients

Background. Given the risks of long-term disability and job loss in workers on sick leave, quick return-to-work is a primary focus of occupational rehabilitation across health fields. This study sought to identify the return-to-work obstacles and self-efficacy beliefs that predict sick leave duration after kidney transplantation. Given a lack of instruments, the Return-to-Work Obstacles and Self-Efficacy Scale was adapted for Solid Organ Transplantation (ROSES-SOT). Methods. Workers on sick leave recruited across 3 Canadian health centers were administered the ROSES-SOT 0.5–7.3 mo postkidney transplantation (n = 62). Half of the sample was administered the tool again 2 wk later (reliability over time). Workers were then called, and return-to-work dates were collected up to 1 y posttransplantation. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were calculated (internal consistency), and univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed on sick leave duration. Control variables were age, gender, ethnicity, education, income, disability benefits coverage, manual work, complications, comorbidities, donor, physical and mental health status, and stress about returning to work during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results. The face and content validity of the ROSES-SOT were assessed and deemed satisfactory. Eight of 10 ROSES-SOT dimensions demonstrated satisfactory reliability. COVID-related stress, job demands, fear of relapse, loss of motivation, and organizational injustice predicted sick leave duration. COVID-related stress and organizational injustice remained multivariable predictors. Conclusions. The ROSES-SOT showed adequate reliability and predictive value. Self-efficacy and perceived obstacles could be intervention targets when providing return-to-work support after kidney transplantation. Future studies could investigate the replicability of findings for other transplant types.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transplantation Direct
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/txd.0000000000001865
Primary Topic
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Self-efficacy and Perceived Obstacles to Return to Work After Solid Organ Transplantation: Validation of a Tool and Assessment of its Predictive Value for Kidney Transplant Recipients

Keira Gaudet, Héloïse Cardinal, Suzon Collette, Ruth Sapir‐Pichhadze et al.
Transplantation Direct
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
article

Self-efficacy and Perceived Obstacles to Return to Work After Solid Organ Transplantation: Validation of a Tool and Assessment of its Predictive Value for Kidney Transplant Recipients

Keira Gaudet, Héloïse Cardinal, Suzon Collette, Ruth Sapir‐Pichhadze, Marie Achille, Marc Corbière, Tianyan Chen
article en

Abstract

Background. Given the risks of long-term disability and job loss in workers on sick leave, quick return-to-work is a primary focus of occupational rehabilitation across health fields. This study sought to identify the return-to-work obstacles and self-efficacy beliefs that predict sick leave duration after kidney transplantation. Given a lack of instruments, the Return-to-Work Obstacles and Self-Efficacy Scale was adapted for Solid Organ Transplantation (ROSES-SOT). Methods. Workers on sick leave recruited across 3 Canadian health centers were administered the ROSES-SOT 0.5–7.3 mo postkidney transplantation (n = 62). Half of the sample was administered the tool again 2 wk later (reliability over time). Workers were then called, and return-to-work dates were collected up to 1 y posttransplantation. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were calculated (internal consistency), and univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed on sick leave duration. Control variables were age, gender, ethnicity, education, income, disability benefits coverage, manual work, complications, comorbidities, donor, physical and mental health status, and stress about returning to work during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results. The face and content validity of the ROSES-SOT were assessed and deemed satisfactory. Eight of 10 ROSES-SOT dimensions demonstrated satisfactory reliability. COVID-related stress, job demands, fear of relapse, loss of motivation, and organizational injustice predicted sick leave duration. COVID-related stress and organizational injustice remained multivariable predictors. Conclusions. The ROSES-SOT showed adequate reliability and predictive value. Self-efficacy and perceived obstacles could be intervention targets when providing return-to-work support after kidney transplantation. Future studies could investigate the replicability of findings for other transplant types.

Transplantation DirectVol. 11(12)
Université du Québec à Montréal (CA), McGill University Health Centre (CA), Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont (CA), Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA), McGill University (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.