Development of an ESG evaluation framework for China's energy industry using the PSR–AHP model

In recent years, environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations have emerged as critical tools for evaluating the sustainable development capacity of economic entities, with information disclosure serving as an essential component of ESG assessment frameworks. However, in China, ESG disclosure among enterprises, particularly within the energy industry, remains insufficient. Moreover, most existing evaluation systems are adapted from foreign models and fail to account for the unique characteristics of Chinese enterprises and industry-specific contexts. To address these shortcomings, this study develops an ESG evaluation system tailored to the Chinese energy industry by integrating the pressure–state–response (PSR) model with the analytic hierarchy process. The proposed system comprises a three-level structure, including a goal layer encompassing environmental performance, social responsibility, and corporate governance; a first criteria layer subdivided into 9 PSR-based categories; and a second criteria layer containing 32 specific indicators. To ensure comprehensive and socially relevant weighting of the indicators, surveys were conducted among both experts and practitioners, and the aggregation of individual judgments method was employed to synthesize their assessments. The evaluation system was applied to five major state-owned Chinese energy enterprises, whose combined installed capacity represented over half of the national total, using ESG disclosure data from 2019 to 2023. The results indicate that while these enterprises generally achieved high ESG scores (all exceeding 0.75), their performance exhibited notable fluctuations, particularly in the environmental and governance dimensions. Environmental performance emerged as the most influential and volatile factor, underscoring its central role in shaping overall ESG outcomes. Social performance showed steady improvement, while governance performance followed a fluctuating trajectory before eventually rebounding. These findings highlight the necessity of developing stricter environmental standards alongside an ESG evaluation framework that accounts for industry-specific characteristics, in order to promote sustainable development and accelerate the green transformation of China's energy sector. Developing an ESG Evaluation System Tailored to the Chinese Energy Industry • Innovating integrates the PSR model with the AHP method in ESG evaluation of the energy industry: • PSR provides a logical framework (causal relationships + dynamic processes). • AHP provides a weighting mechanism, ensuring both scientific rigor and social relevance. • Combining academic expertise with practitioners’ real working experience, bridging the gap between theory and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Sustainable Development/Energy for sustainable development
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2025.101877
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of an ESG evaluation framework for China's energy industry using the PSR–AHP model

Kultip Suwanteep, Takehiko Murayama, Shigeo Nishikizawa, Lin Mengyuan
1 citations
Energy Sustainable Development/Energy for sustainable development
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
3.13
article

Development of an ESG evaluation framework for China's energy industry using the PSR–AHP model

Kultip Suwanteep, Takehiko Murayama, Shigeo Nishikizawa, Lin Mengyuan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In recent years, environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations have emerged as critical tools for evaluating the sustainable development capacity of economic entities, with information disclosure serving as an essential component of ESG assessment frameworks. However, in China, ESG disclosure among enterprises, particularly within the energy industry, remains insufficient. Moreover, most existing evaluation systems are adapted from foreign models and fail to account for the unique characteristics of Chinese enterprises and industry-specific contexts. To address these shortcomings, this study develops an ESG evaluation system tailored to the Chinese energy industry by integrating the pressure–state–response (PSR) model with the analytic hierarchy process. The proposed system comprises a three-level structure, including a goal layer encompassing environmental performance, social responsibility, and corporate governance; a first criteria layer subdivided into 9 PSR-based categories; and a second criteria layer containing 32 specific indicators. To ensure comprehensive and socially relevant weighting of the indicators, surveys were conducted among both experts and practitioners, and the aggregation of individual judgments method was employed to synthesize their assessments. The evaluation system was applied to five major state-owned Chinese energy enterprises, whose combined installed capacity represented over half of the national total, using ESG disclosure data from 2019 to 2023. The results indicate that while these enterprises generally achieved high ESG scores (all exceeding 0.75), their performance exhibited notable fluctuations, particularly in the environmental and governance dimensions. Environmental performance emerged as the most influential and volatile factor, underscoring its central role in shaping overall ESG outcomes. Social performance showed steady improvement, while governance performance followed a fluctuating trajectory before eventually rebounding. These findings highlight the necessity of developing stricter environmental standards alongside an ESG evaluation framework that accounts for industry-specific characteristics, in order to promote sustainable development and accelerate the green transformation of China's energy sector. Developing an ESG Evaluation System Tailored to the Chinese Energy Industry • Innovating integrates the PSR model with the AHP method in ESG evaluation of the energy industry: • PSR provides a logical framework (causal relationships + dynamic processes). • AHP provides a weighting mechanism, ensuring both scientific rigor and social relevance. • Combining academic expertise with practitioners’ real working experience, bridging the gap between theory and practice.

Energy Sustainable Development/Energy for sustainable developmentVol. 89
Tokyo Institute of Technology (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.