‘It’s like dominoes’: middle managers transversal agency and the complexity of navigating transformation in post-conflict higher education

Abstract Universities are increasingly expected to contribute to societal development by promoting equality, inclusion and diversity, while preparing ethical individuals capable of navigating uncertain futures. In post-conflict contexts, marked by reconciliation efforts, oppressive legacies and intergenerational trauma, the imperative to transform higher education becomes critical to consolidating fragile democracies. This paper examines how middle managers in universities, who are strategically positioned to drive institutional transformation, experience, enact and interpret their agency. It explores how their gender and social location shape this agency, and how institutional structures both enable and constrain their capacity to act. The study draws on 14 in-depth interviews with mid-level managers from three universities in South Africa and Northern Ireland. Thematic analysis using NVivo revealed that participants’ sense of agency is situated at the intersection of their views of transformation as either a personal-political process or an instrumental task. We argue that the confluence of historical legacies, contemporary issues and identity significantly shapes mid-level managers’ transformative agency. In response to structural barriers and entrenched university hierarchies, their agency manifests through a form of transversal politics—characterised by both symbolic and practical micro-actions. We employ the concepts of ‘constructive interference’ and ‘domino effect’ to describe how mid-level managers’ ‘transversal agency’ may initiate incremental yet meaningful disruptions within hegemonic institutional structures. We conclude that while agency for transformation remains precarious—particularly under the weight of racial, colonial and neoliberal capitalist pressures—mid-level manager micro-affective interventions hold significant potential for enacting non-hegemonic and justice-oriented transformations in higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Higher Education
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-025-01537-6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.76

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘It’s like dominoes’: middle managers transversal agency and the complexity of navigating transformation in post-conflict higher education

Grace Ese‐osa Idahosa, David W. Love
1 citations
Higher Education
Management and Organizational Studies
2.76
article

‘It’s like dominoes’: middle managers transversal agency and the complexity of navigating transformation in post-conflict higher education

Grace Ese‐osa Idahosa, David W. Love
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Universities are increasingly expected to contribute to societal development by promoting equality, inclusion and diversity, while preparing ethical individuals capable of navigating uncertain futures. In post-conflict contexts, marked by reconciliation efforts, oppressive legacies and intergenerational trauma, the imperative to transform higher education becomes critical to consolidating fragile democracies. This paper examines how middle managers in universities, who are strategically positioned to drive institutional transformation, experience, enact and interpret their agency. It explores how their gender and social location shape this agency, and how institutional structures both enable and constrain their capacity to act. The study draws on 14 in-depth interviews with mid-level managers from three universities in South Africa and Northern Ireland. Thematic analysis using NVivo revealed that participants’ sense of agency is situated at the intersection of their views of transformation as either a personal-political process or an instrumental task. We argue that the confluence of historical legacies, contemporary issues and identity significantly shapes mid-level managers’ transformative agency. In response to structural barriers and entrenched university hierarchies, their agency manifests through a form of transversal politics—characterised by both symbolic and practical micro-actions. We employ the concepts of ‘constructive interference’ and ‘domino effect’ to describe how mid-level managers’ ‘transversal agency’ may initiate incremental yet meaningful disruptions within hegemonic institutional structures. We conclude that while agency for transformation remains precarious—particularly under the weight of racial, colonial and neoliberal capitalist pressures—mid-level manager micro-affective interventions hold significant potential for enacting non-hegemonic and justice-oriented transformations in higher education.

Higher Education
University of Johannesburg (ZA), University of Cambridge (GB), Homerton University Hospital (GB)
Queen's University Belfast, Queen's University, University of Johannesburg
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Management and Organizational Studies
2.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.