Using automated vehicle locator data to classify discretionary police patrol across space

Place-based policing strategies assume officers have sufficient discretionary time to engage in proactive crime prevention activities, yet little research examines the spatial distribution of uncommitted patrol time. This study analyzes automated vehicle locator (AVL) data from Manchester, New Hampshire (2022−2023) to classify discretionary police patrol patterns across 5878 street segments. Using over 9.7 million GPS coordinates recorded every 10 s from patrol vehicles, we measure the proportion of patrol time that is discretionary (not assigned to a call for service) versus committed (assigned to a call for service). Group-based trajectory modeling identified three distinct groups: 55 % of street segments had high discretionary time (averaging 50 % of monthly patrol time), 26 % had medium discretionary time (averaging 38 % of monthly patrol time), and 19 % had low discretionary time (averaging 36 % of monthly patrol time). Anselin Moran's I revealed significant clustering of both high and low discretionary time segments. Multinomial logistic regression examined factors predicting discretionary time clusters. Notably, none of the crime measures significantly predicted high discretionary time hot spots, suggesting a potential misalignment between patrol availability and crime prevention needs. Traffic-related calls for service were the only police measure positively associated with high discretionary time clusters. Areas with higher concentrated disadvantage and ambient population were more likely to be discretionary time hot spots, while theft was associated with lower odds of high discretionary clustering. These findings challenge assumptions underlying place-based policing interventions and suggest that discretionary patrol time may not naturally concentrate where it is most needed for crime prevention.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
CrimRxiv
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21428/cb6ab371.27b9d6c0
Primary Topic
Crime Patterns and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using automated vehicle locator data to classify discretionary police patrol across space

Nathan T. Connealy, Eric L. Piza, Carmine F. Palermo, S. Reid
CrimRxiv
Crime Patterns and Interventions
article

Using automated vehicle locator data to classify discretionary police patrol across space

Nathan T. Connealy, Eric L. Piza, Carmine F. Palermo, S. Reid
article en

Abstract

Place-based policing strategies assume officers have sufficient discretionary time to engage in proactive crime prevention activities, yet little research examines the spatial distribution of uncommitted patrol time. This study analyzes automated vehicle locator (AVL) data from Manchester, New Hampshire (2022−2023) to classify discretionary police patrol patterns across 5878 street segments. Using over 9.7 million GPS coordinates recorded every 10 s from patrol vehicles, we measure the proportion of patrol time that is discretionary (not assigned to a call for service) versus committed (assigned to a call for service). Group-based trajectory modeling identified three distinct groups: 55 % of street segments had high discretionary time (averaging 50 % of monthly patrol time), 26 % had medium discretionary time (averaging 38 % of monthly patrol time), and 19 % had low discretionary time (averaging 36 % of monthly patrol time). Anselin Moran's I revealed significant clustering of both high and low discretionary time segments. Multinomial logistic regression examined factors predicting discretionary time clusters. Notably, none of the crime measures significantly predicted high discretionary time hot spots, suggesting a potential misalignment between patrol availability and crime prevention needs. Traffic-related calls for service were the only police measure positively associated with high discretionary time clusters. Areas with higher concentrated disadvantage and ambient population were more likely to be discretionary time hot spots, while theft was associated with lower odds of high discretionary clustering. These findings challenge assumptions underlying place-based policing interventions and suggest that discretionary patrol time may not naturally concentrate where it is most needed for crime prevention.

CrimRxiv
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Crime Patterns and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.