Evaluating Sentiment and Factuality of Offshore Wind Technological Trends Using Large Language Models

The urgent pursuit of net-zero emissions presents a critical challenge for modern societies, necessitating a speedup of transformative shifts across sectors to mitigate climate change. Predicting trends and drivers in the integration of energy technologies is essential to addressing this challenge, as it informs policy decisions, strategic investments, and the deployment of innovative solutions crucial for transitioning to a sustainable energy future. Despite the importance of accurate forecasting, current methods remain limited, especially in leveraging the vast, unlabelled energy literature available. However, with the advent of large language models (LLMs), the ability to interpret and extract insights from extensive textual data has significantly advanced. Sentiment analysis, in particular, has just emerged as a vital tool for detecting scientific opinions from the energy literature, which can be harnessed to forecast energy trends. This study introduces a novel multi-agent framework, EnergyEval, to evaluate the sentiment and factuality of the energy literature. The core novelty of the multi-agent framework is found to be the use of heterogeneous energy-specialised roles with different LLMs. This investigation, using both multiple persona agents and different LLMs, provides a bespoke collaboration mechanism for multi-agent debate (MAD). In addition, we believe our approach can extend across the energy industry, where deep application of MAD is yet to be exploited. We apply EnergyEval to the case of UK offshore wind literature, assessing its predictive performance. Our findings indicate that the sentiment predicted by the EnergyEval effectively aligns with observed trends in increasing the installed capacity and reductions in Levelised Cost of Energy (LCOE). It also helps us to identify key drivers in offshore wind development. The advantage of employing a multi-agent LLM debate team allows us to achieve competitive accuracy compared to single-LLM-based methods, while significantly reducing computational costs. Overall, the results highlight the potential of EnergyEval as a robust tool for forecasting technology developments in the pursuit of net-zero emissions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18215816
Primary Topic
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Sentiment and Factuality of Offshore Wind Technological Trends Using Large Language Models

Konstantina Vogiatzaki, Stephen Roberts, Holly Freed
Energies
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
article

Evaluating Sentiment and Factuality of Offshore Wind Technological Trends Using Large Language Models

Konstantina Vogiatzaki, Stephen Roberts, Holly Freed
article en

Abstract

The urgent pursuit of net-zero emissions presents a critical challenge for modern societies, necessitating a speedup of transformative shifts across sectors to mitigate climate change. Predicting trends and drivers in the integration of energy technologies is essential to addressing this challenge, as it informs policy decisions, strategic investments, and the deployment of innovative solutions crucial for transitioning to a sustainable energy future. Despite the importance of accurate forecasting, current methods remain limited, especially in leveraging the vast, unlabelled energy literature available. However, with the advent of large language models (LLMs), the ability to interpret and extract insights from extensive textual data has significantly advanced. Sentiment analysis, in particular, has just emerged as a vital tool for detecting scientific opinions from the energy literature, which can be harnessed to forecast energy trends. This study introduces a novel multi-agent framework, EnergyEval, to evaluate the sentiment and factuality of the energy literature. The core novelty of the multi-agent framework is found to be the use of heterogeneous energy-specialised roles with different LLMs. This investigation, using both multiple persona agents and different LLMs, provides a bespoke collaboration mechanism for multi-agent debate (MAD). In addition, we believe our approach can extend across the energy industry, where deep application of MAD is yet to be exploited. We apply EnergyEval to the case of UK offshore wind literature, assessing its predictive performance. Our findings indicate that the sentiment predicted by the EnergyEval effectively aligns with observed trends in increasing the installed capacity and reductions in Levelised Cost of Energy (LCOE). It also helps us to identify key drivers in offshore wind development. The advantage of employing a multi-agent LLM debate team allows us to achieve competitive accuracy compared to single-LLM-based methods, while significantly reducing computational costs. Overall, the results highlight the potential of EnergyEval as a robust tool for forecasting technology developments in the pursuit of net-zero emissions.

EnergiesVol. 18(21)
University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.