Source Apportionment of Soil Heavy Metals in Urban Agglomerations Based on the APCS-MLR Model

In order to study the differential characteristics of heavy metal contamination levels and their sources in soils under various land use types and anthropogenic activities at a regional scale, this study focused on the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) urban agglomeration in North China. We analyzed heavy metal content in three land use types (urban green spaces, croplands, and vegetable fields/orchards) through field sampling and laboratory analysis, with content determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The sources of heavy metals were quantitatively apportioned their sources using the absolute principal component score–multiple linear regression (APCS-MLR) method. Results of this study are as follows: (1) Heavy metal content varied among different soil types, with vegetable fields/orchards soils showing relatively higher content. Urban green spaces and cropland soils exhibited comparable heavy metal levels, though urban green spaces displayed higher spatial heterogeneity, while cropland soils showed more homogeneous distributions. (2) The APCS-MLR model identified five pollution sources: mixed traffic–coal combustion sources, industrial sources, agricultural sources, natural sources, and unknown sources. Natural sources were consistently the dominant contributors of arsenic (As), chromium (Cr), and nickel (Ni) across all three land use types, with contribution rates of 32.62–70.26%. Traffic and coal combustion emissions were the primary sources of lead (Pb) and copper (Cu) in urban green spaces, accounting for 40.28–66.26%, while industrial activities showed the highest contributions to zinc (Zn) and cadmium (Cd) in urban green spaces, at 45.88–65.25%. Agricultural activities contributed similarly to Cd accumulation in both cropland and vegetable fields/orchards soils (41.68–51.32%), but their contributions to Cu and Zn in vegetable fields/orchards soils (46.62–55.58%) were significantly higher than those in cropland (9.21–13.40%). Notably, unexplained sources accounted for 18.64–42.59% of heavy metals in vegetable fields/orchards soils, suggesting particularly complex sources in these systems. This study provides a scientific basis for sustainable soil management strategies and promoting coordinated pollution control in urban agglomeration regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219798
Primary Topic
Heavy metals in environment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Source Apportionment of Soil Heavy Metals in Urban Agglomerations Based on the APCS-MLR Model

Yuan Zhang, Yanjie Zhang, Yunxia Wang, Min Li et al.
Sustainability
Heavy metals in environment
article

Source Apportionment of Soil Heavy Metals in Urban Agglomerations Based on the APCS-MLR Model

Yuan Zhang, Yanjie Zhang, Yunxia Wang, Min Li, Xinmiao Wang, Lei Yang
article en

Abstract

In order to study the differential characteristics of heavy metal contamination levels and their sources in soils under various land use types and anthropogenic activities at a regional scale, this study focused on the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) urban agglomeration in North China. We analyzed heavy metal content in three land use types (urban green spaces, croplands, and vegetable fields/orchards) through field sampling and laboratory analysis, with content determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The sources of heavy metals were quantitatively apportioned their sources using the absolute principal component score–multiple linear regression (APCS-MLR) method. Results of this study are as follows: (1) Heavy metal content varied among different soil types, with vegetable fields/orchards soils showing relatively higher content. Urban green spaces and cropland soils exhibited comparable heavy metal levels, though urban green spaces displayed higher spatial heterogeneity, while cropland soils showed more homogeneous distributions. (2) The APCS-MLR model identified five pollution sources: mixed traffic–coal combustion sources, industrial sources, agricultural sources, natural sources, and unknown sources. Natural sources were consistently the dominant contributors of arsenic (As), chromium (Cr), and nickel (Ni) across all three land use types, with contribution rates of 32.62–70.26%. Traffic and coal combustion emissions were the primary sources of lead (Pb) and copper (Cu) in urban green spaces, accounting for 40.28–66.26%, while industrial activities showed the highest contributions to zinc (Zn) and cadmium (Cd) in urban green spaces, at 45.88–65.25%. Agricultural activities contributed similarly to Cd accumulation in both cropland and vegetable fields/orchards soils (41.68–51.32%), but their contributions to Cu and Zn in vegetable fields/orchards soils (46.62–55.58%) were significantly higher than those in cropland (9.21–13.40%). Notably, unexplained sources accounted for 18.64–42.59% of heavy metals in vegetable fields/orchards soils, suggesting particularly complex sources in these systems. This study provides a scientific basis for sustainable soil management strategies and promoting coordinated pollution control in urban agglomeration regions.

SustainabilityVol. 17(21)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences (CN), Hebei Academy of Sciences (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Hebei Academy of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Heavy metals in environment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.