Coronal CT Attenuation Measurement for Osteoporosis Screening at the Proximal Femur: A Comparative Study with the Axial Approach

<b>Objectives</b>: There is currently a lack of research on coronal Computed Tomography (CT) attenuation measurements. This study aimed to evaluate a coronal CT attenuation measurement method for osteoporosis screening at the proximal femur and compare its performance with the conventional axial approach. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 708 patients who underwent both proximal femur CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) within a 6-month period between January 2013 and December 2023. The axial and coronal CT attenuation values for these patients were measured. The correlation, agreement, and efficacy in screening osteoporosis of the two methods were further evaluated and compared. <b>Results</b>: Both measurement methods demonstrated excellent inter-observer reliability. Axial measurements yielded slightly higher HU values than coronal measurements (mean difference: 3.93 Hounsfield unit (HU), <i>p</i> < 0.001), and the Bland-Altman analysis showed a Coefficient of Repeatability (CR) = 9.09 HU (95% CI: 8.63 to 9.61) between the two methods. A strong correlation was observed between the two measurements (Pearson's coefficient (r) of 0.919 (95% CI: 0.907-0.930, <i>p</i> < 0.001)). Coronal measurements showed comparable correlation with femoral T-scores to axial measurements (0.766 (95% CI: 0.730-0.808) vs. 0.736 (95% CI: 0.697-0.771), <i>p</i> = 0.195). Coronal and axial measurements exhibit good predictive performance for osteoporosis diagnosis, with no statistically significant difference in AUC values between the two methods (0.850 vs. 0.864, <i>p</i> = 0.097). <b>Conclusions</b>: The coronal CT attenuation measurement method provides a reliable and complementary diagnostic tool for opportunistic osteoporosis screening, demonstrating strong correlation with axial measurements and comparable diagnostic accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15212794
Primary Topic
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coronal CT Attenuation Measurement for Osteoporosis Screening at the Proximal Femur: A Comparative Study with the Axial Approach

Zhuo Chen, Yun Tian, Jixing Fan, Junbo Qi et al.
Diagnostics
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
article

Coronal CT Attenuation Measurement for Osteoporosis Screening at the Proximal Femur: A Comparative Study with the Axial Approach

Zhuo Chen, Yun Tian, Jixing Fan, Junbo Qi, Yanlei Dong, Yutian Luo, Yuanyu Hu, Kaifeng Ye
article en

Abstract

<b>Objectives</b>: There is currently a lack of research on coronal Computed Tomography (CT) attenuation measurements. This study aimed to evaluate a coronal CT attenuation measurement method for osteoporosis screening at the proximal femur and compare its performance with the conventional axial approach. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 708 patients who underwent both proximal femur CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) within a 6-month period between January 2013 and December 2023. The axial and coronal CT attenuation values for these patients were measured. The correlation, agreement, and efficacy in screening osteoporosis of the two methods were further evaluated and compared. <b>Results</b>: Both measurement methods demonstrated excellent inter-observer reliability. Axial measurements yielded slightly higher HU values than coronal measurements (mean difference: 3.93 Hounsfield unit (HU), <i>p</i> < 0.001), and the Bland-Altman analysis showed a Coefficient of Repeatability (CR) = 9.09 HU (95% CI: 8.63 to 9.61) between the two methods. A strong correlation was observed between the two measurements (Pearson's coefficient (r) of 0.919 (95% CI: 0.907-0.930, <i>p</i> < 0.001)). Coronal measurements showed comparable correlation with femoral T-scores to axial measurements (0.766 (95% CI: 0.730-0.808) vs. 0.736 (95% CI: 0.697-0.771), <i>p</i> = 0.195). Coronal and axial measurements exhibit good predictive performance for osteoporosis diagnosis, with no statistically significant difference in AUC values between the two methods (0.850 vs. 0.864, <i>p</i> = 0.097). <b>Conclusions</b>: The coronal CT attenuation measurement method provides a reliable and complementary diagnostic tool for opportunistic osteoporosis screening, demonstrating strong correlation with axial measurements and comparable diagnostic accuracy.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(21)
Peking University (CN), Peking University Third Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.