Dictatorships and Western Public Relations Firms: Evidence from the United States

Why and when do dictatorships use Western Public Relations (PR) firms? About 80% of post-WWII dictatorships have enlisted US-based PR specialists. While emerging literature explores strategies of authoritarian image management, little systematic is known about the hiring of the dictators’ foreign helpers. We argue that authoritarian regimes can hire Western PR professionals i) to counter criticism, ii) amplify positive publicity, iii) stabilize foreign support, iv) or signal their allegiance. Our macro-quantitative analysis of thousands of contracts between authoritarian regimes and US-based PR firms (1945-2022) offers strong support for two of the logics and partial support for the others. We supplement these findings with evidence from five short case studies including China. Together, the findings are crucial for understanding how authoritarian regimes wield soft power and influence foreign public discourse and decision-making, with important implications for international security and the resilience of the global rules-based order.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Security Studies
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2025.2566170
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dictatorships and Western Public Relations Firms: Evidence from the United States

Adam Scharpf, Christian Gläßel, Alexander Dukalskis
Security Studies
Media Influence and Politics
article

Dictatorships and Western Public Relations Firms: Evidence from the United States

Adam Scharpf, Christian Gläßel, Alexander Dukalskis
article en

Abstract

Why and when do dictatorships use Western Public Relations (PR) firms? About 80% of post-WWII dictatorships have enlisted US-based PR specialists. While emerging literature explores strategies of authoritarian image management, little systematic is known about the hiring of the dictators’ foreign helpers. We argue that authoritarian regimes can hire Western PR professionals i) to counter criticism, ii) amplify positive publicity, iii) stabilize foreign support, iv) or signal their allegiance. Our macro-quantitative analysis of thousands of contracts between authoritarian regimes and US-based PR firms (1945-2022) offers strong support for two of the logics and partial support for the others. We supplement these findings with evidence from five short case studies including China. Together, the findings are crucial for understanding how authoritarian regimes wield soft power and influence foreign public discourse and decision-making, with important implications for international security and the resilience of the global rules-based order.

Security StudiesVol. 34(4)
Twitter (United States) (US)
Aarhus Universitet, Independent Social Research Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Media Influence and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dictatorships and Western Public Relations Firms: Evidence from the United States — Adam Scharpf, Christian Gläßel, et al. · Security Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS