IS THE ANTERIOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE HIP APPROACH (AMIS) ASSOCIATED WITH A HIGHER RATE OF POLYMICROBIAL INFECTIONS COMPARED TO THE OTHER SURGICAL APPROACHES?

Aim The direct anterior minimally invasive approach (AMIS) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is gaining increasing popularity due to its lower invasiveness compared to other traditional surgical approaches. The aim of the study is to compare the pathogens causing periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) in THAs implanted via AMIS with those causing infections in THA implanted via other approaches. Method All consecutive patients, treated for early or delayed onset periprosthetic hip infection in our hospital from 2011 to the present were selected. Both PJI after THA and hemiarthroplasties (HA) were included. Only pathogens isolated from synovial fluid and intraoperative tissue cultures were included in the analysis. Late infections or those with hematogenous etiology, as well as pathogens isolated via wound swab, were excluded. Differences in pathogens found and surgical times between the AMIS group and the non-AMIS group were analyzed using Fisher's exact test and Student's t-test, respectively. Results Twenty-one patients were included, 10 men and 11 women, with an average age of 78 years, 7 with PJI after HA and 14 after THA. All HAs were implanted via the direct lateral approach, while the THAs were implanted as follows: 9 via AMIS, 2 via posterolateral approach, and 3 via direct lateral approach. The most frequently isolated pathogens were: 7 S. aureus , 7 coagulase-negative staphylococci, and 3 P. aeruginosa . In 4 cases, all from the AMIS group, polymicrobial infections were found (p=0.02). Gram-negative bacteria were more frequent in the non-AMIS group. No significant differences were found in surgical times between THAs implanted via AMIS and those implanted via other approaches, but the duration of HA surgeries was, as expected, shorter than that of THA surgeries. Conclusions Recent literature has shown that infections in THAs implanted via AMIS present a characteristic flora. Our study confirms these findings, highlighting a higher number of polymicrobial infections in the AMIS group. These results should be confirmed in larger cohorts and exclusively of THA cases to avoid confounding factors related to the longer surgical duration of THAs compared to HAs (p=0.01).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2025.12.009
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IS THE ANTERIOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE HIP APPROACH (AMIS) ASSOCIATED WITH A HIGHER RATE OF POLYMICROBIAL INFECTIONS COMPARED TO THE OTHER SURGICAL APPROACHES?

R. Vanelli, Ilaria Morelli, Chiara Grimaldi, Fabio Zanini et al.
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
article

IS THE ANTERIOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE HIP APPROACH (AMIS) ASSOCIATED WITH A HIGHER RATE OF POLYMICROBIAL INFECTIONS COMPARED TO THE OTHER SURGICAL APPROACHES?

R. Vanelli, Ilaria Morelli, Chiara Grimaldi, Fabio Zanini, Susanna Gadda Sanzo
article en

Abstract

Aim The direct anterior minimally invasive approach (AMIS) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is gaining increasing popularity due to its lower invasiveness compared to other traditional surgical approaches. The aim of the study is to compare the pathogens causing periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) in THAs implanted via AMIS with those causing infections in THA implanted via other approaches. Method All consecutive patients, treated for early or delayed onset periprosthetic hip infection in our hospital from 2011 to the present were selected. Both PJI after THA and hemiarthroplasties (HA) were included. Only pathogens isolated from synovial fluid and intraoperative tissue cultures were included in the analysis. Late infections or those with hematogenous etiology, as well as pathogens isolated via wound swab, were excluded. Differences in pathogens found and surgical times between the AMIS group and the non-AMIS group were analyzed using Fisher's exact test and Student's t-test, respectively. Results Twenty-one patients were included, 10 men and 11 women, with an average age of 78 years, 7 with PJI after HA and 14 after THA. All HAs were implanted via the direct lateral approach, while the THAs were implanted as follows: 9 via AMIS, 2 via posterolateral approach, and 3 via direct lateral approach. The most frequently isolated pathogens were: 7 S. aureus , 7 coagulase-negative staphylococci, and 3 P. aeruginosa . In 4 cases, all from the AMIS group, polymicrobial infections were found (p=0.02). Gram-negative bacteria were more frequent in the non-AMIS group. No significant differences were found in surgical times between THAs implanted via AMIS and those implanted via other approaches, but the duration of HA surgeries was, as expected, shorter than that of THA surgeries. Conclusions Recent literature has shown that infections in THAs implanted via AMIS present a characteristic flora. Our study confirms these findings, highlighting a higher number of polymicrobial infections in the AMIS group. These results should be confirmed in larger cohorts and exclusively of THA cases to avoid confounding factors related to the longer surgical duration of THAs compared to HAs (p=0.01).

Orthopaedic ProceedingsVol. 107-B(SUPP_12)
University of Pavia (IT), Milano Metropoli Development Agency (IT), Nuovo Ospedale San Giovanni di Dio (IT), Ospedale Bassini (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.