CLINICAL OUTCOME OF THE USE OF INTRAMEDULLARY NAILS WITH ABSORBABLE ANTIBIOTIC CARRIERS (INAAC)

Aims Infected non-unions can be treated using antibiotic-coated intramedullary nails (IMN), mainly employing PMMA cement. However, there are few reports on outcomes of absorbable antibiotic carriers in confirmed fracture-related infection (FRI), or in high-risk patients. We present a consecutive series of patients treated with IMNs coated with an absorbable ceramic, loaded with antibiotics (INaac). Method Patients with either consensus definition confirmed FRI or high-risk of infection with IM nailing (risk >20%) received an INaac using a standardized technique 1 . The canal was reamed and partly filled with liquid, antibiotic-loaded ceramic, before inserting a standard locked IMN, 1mm smaller than the reamed diameter. Systemic antibiotics were given for 6-12 weeks, based on the deep tissue cultures. The primary outcome was infection-free union after one operation. Secondary outcomes included bone union, infection recurrence and ease of nail removal. Results 61 patients (26 femurs, 26 tibias, 9 ankles) were treated. Mean follow-up was 2.3 years (SD 1.60). 40 patients had confirmed FRI (infected non-unions) and 21 had nailing after prolonged external fixation, bone transport or previous FRI with non-union. Staph. aureus was the commonest pathogen (33%) but 30.6% had polymicrobial infection. Gentamicin was implanted in all 61 patients with 22 also having vancomycin in the ceramic carrier. Infection-free union was achieved in 53/61 (86.9%) after one operation. Infection was eradicated in 56/61 (91.8%) and 56/61 (91.8%) united. 16 patients had removal of their nails without difficulty. In the FRI Group, 34/40 (85.0%) achieved infection-free union after index operation. 3/40 had an aseptic non-union, confirmed by tissue sampling at revision nailing, 3/40 had a recurrent infection (two successfully treated with nail removal and one declined further treatment). 18/21 (85.7%) high-risk patients achieved infection-free union from index operation. Two developed infection (9.5%), successfully treated in one with nail removal, and nail exchange in the other. A further case had surgery for aseptic non-union. 58/61 (95.1%) had infection-free union at final follow-up. There were no amputations. Conclusion Combining absorbable antibiotics with standard trauma nails (INaac) allows safe stabilization of infected non-unions and high-risk fractures in a single stage with high rates of infection clearance and union. This may reduce treatment morbidity by avoiding the use of external fixation or multiple stage surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2025.12.085
Primary Topic
Bone fractures and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CLINICAL OUTCOME OF THE USE OF INTRAMEDULLARY NAILS WITH ABSORBABLE ANTIBIOTIC CARRIERS (INAAC)

David Stubbs, Andrew Hotchen, Asanka Wijendra, Mark D. Robinson et al.
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Bone fractures and treatments
article

CLINICAL OUTCOME OF THE USE OF INTRAMEDULLARY NAILS WITH ABSORBABLE ANTIBIOTIC CARRIERS (INAAC)

David Stubbs, Andrew Hotchen, Asanka Wijendra, Mark D. Robinson, Jamie Ferguson, Eoghan Pomeroy, Martin McNally
article en

Abstract

Aims Infected non-unions can be treated using antibiotic-coated intramedullary nails (IMN), mainly employing PMMA cement. However, there are few reports on outcomes of absorbable antibiotic carriers in confirmed fracture-related infection (FRI), or in high-risk patients. We present a consecutive series of patients treated with IMNs coated with an absorbable ceramic, loaded with antibiotics (INaac). Method Patients with either consensus definition confirmed FRI or high-risk of infection with IM nailing (risk >20%) received an INaac using a standardized technique 1 . The canal was reamed and partly filled with liquid, antibiotic-loaded ceramic, before inserting a standard locked IMN, 1mm smaller than the reamed diameter. Systemic antibiotics were given for 6-12 weeks, based on the deep tissue cultures. The primary outcome was infection-free union after one operation. Secondary outcomes included bone union, infection recurrence and ease of nail removal. Results 61 patients (26 femurs, 26 tibias, 9 ankles) were treated. Mean follow-up was 2.3 years (SD 1.60). 40 patients had confirmed FRI (infected non-unions) and 21 had nailing after prolonged external fixation, bone transport or previous FRI with non-union. Staph. aureus was the commonest pathogen (33%) but 30.6% had polymicrobial infection. Gentamicin was implanted in all 61 patients with 22 also having vancomycin in the ceramic carrier. Infection-free union was achieved in 53/61 (86.9%) after one operation. Infection was eradicated in 56/61 (91.8%) and 56/61 (91.8%) united. 16 patients had removal of their nails without difficulty. In the FRI Group, 34/40 (85.0%) achieved infection-free union after index operation. 3/40 had an aseptic non-union, confirmed by tissue sampling at revision nailing, 3/40 had a recurrent infection (two successfully treated with nail removal and one declined further treatment). 18/21 (85.7%) high-risk patients achieved infection-free union from index operation. Two developed infection (9.5%), successfully treated in one with nail removal, and nail exchange in the other. A further case had surgery for aseptic non-union. 58/61 (95.1%) had infection-free union at final follow-up. There were no amputations. Conclusion Combining absorbable antibiotics with standard trauma nails (INaac) allows safe stabilization of infected non-unions and high-risk fractures in a single stage with high rates of infection clearance and union. This may reduce treatment morbidity by avoiding the use of external fixation or multiple stage surgery.

Orthopaedic ProceedingsVol. 107-B(SUPP_12)
Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre (GB), University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Bone fractures and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.