Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Swallowed Topical Corticosteroids in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Network Meta-Analysis

<b>Background</b>: Swallowed topical corticosteroids (STCs) are used as the first-line therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and have been extensively studied in randomized controlled trials (RCTs); however, the presentation and doses varied widely among the studies. <b>Aim</b>: The goal of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of the different STC-based options in EoE patients. <b>Methods</b>: We performed a literature search for RCTs, spanning a time period from database inception to July 2024, in order to compare the efficacy and safety of all STCs used to induce or maintain EoE remission each other and also with placebo or proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in a network meta-analysis. Outcomes are expressed as pooled risk ratios (RRs) of failure and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and we aimed to evaluate histological remission at <15-20 eosinophils per high-power field (eos/hpf), <5-6 eos/hpf, and <1 eos/hpf. The effect sizes for symptomatic improvement and the mean differences for endoscopic EREFS improvement with 95% CIs were also measured. Adverse events were evaluated using RRs, and these included oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiasis and adrenal suppression. <b>Results</b>: Twenty studies involving 1455 patients with active EoE reported on STC effectiveness to induce remission; three additional studies on 232 patients assessed the maintenance of remission. Budesonide 1 mg orodispersible tablets ranked highest in SUCRA in terms of all histological remission endpoints. Budesonide from inhalation devices was the only option superior to placebo in improving symptoms. Budesonide viscous suspension was the only option superior to placebo in improving endoscopy. No therapy was significantly associated with the risk of any adverse event. Significant inconsistencies and small study effects were detected in multiple comparisons. <b>Conclusions:</b> Budesonide orodispersible tablets were the best option for achieving EoE histological remission, but not symptomatic or endoscopic improvement. STC formulations were as safe as placebo or PPI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14217823
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Swallowed Topical Corticosteroids in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Network Meta-Analysis

Celia Álvarez‐Bueno, Iván Cavero‐Redondo, Vicente Martínez‐Vizcaíno, Alfredo José Lucendo et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
2.01
article

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Swallowed Topical Corticosteroids in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Network Meta-Analysis

Celia Álvarez‐Bueno, Iván Cavero‐Redondo, Vicente Martínez‐Vizcaíno, Alfredo José Lucendo, Ángel Arias
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Swallowed topical corticosteroids (STCs) are used as the first-line therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and have been extensively studied in randomized controlled trials (RCTs); however, the presentation and doses varied widely among the studies. <b>Aim</b>: The goal of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of the different STC-based options in EoE patients. <b>Methods</b>: We performed a literature search for RCTs, spanning a time period from database inception to July 2024, in order to compare the efficacy and safety of all STCs used to induce or maintain EoE remission each other and also with placebo or proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in a network meta-analysis. Outcomes are expressed as pooled risk ratios (RRs) of failure and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and we aimed to evaluate histological remission at <15-20 eosinophils per high-power field (eos/hpf), <5-6 eos/hpf, and <1 eos/hpf. The effect sizes for symptomatic improvement and the mean differences for endoscopic EREFS improvement with 95% CIs were also measured. Adverse events were evaluated using RRs, and these included oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiasis and adrenal suppression. <b>Results</b>: Twenty studies involving 1455 patients with active EoE reported on STC effectiveness to induce remission; three additional studies on 232 patients assessed the maintenance of remission. Budesonide 1 mg orodispersible tablets ranked highest in SUCRA in terms of all histological remission endpoints. Budesonide from inhalation devices was the only option superior to placebo in improving symptoms. Budesonide viscous suspension was the only option superior to placebo in improving endoscopy. No therapy was significantly associated with the risk of any adverse event. Significant inconsistencies and small study effects were detected in multiple comparisons. <b>Conclusions:</b> Budesonide orodispersible tablets were the best option for achieving EoE histological remission, but not symptomatic or endoscopic improvement. STC formulations were as safe as placebo or PPI.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(21)
Universidad Autónoma de Chile (CL), Hospital San Juan de la Cruz (ES), Hospital General de Tomelloso (ES), Hospital Universitario de La Princesa (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (ES), Servicio de Salud de Castilla La Mancha (ES), Camilo José Cela University (ES), University of Castilla-La Mancha (ES)
Dr. Falk Pharma
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.