Community of practice and multi-level mentoring: a novel approach to research mentorship in higher education

Purpose This study examines the implementation of multi-level research mentoring (MRM), a novel collaborative approach that leverages community of practice (CoP) theory to enhance research mentoring in a teacher education program for bachelor’s and master’s level students. Design/methodology/approach Through the CoP framework, the research scrutinizes how structured interactions such as mutual engagement, joint enterprise and shared repertoire can advance the mentoring dynamics. Conducted with seven master’s and four bachelor’s students under the guidance of two academic supervisors, data were collected using questionnaires, interviews and WhatsApp communications. Findings The study unveils variations in engagement levels among groups, with one achieving full participation through well-aligned research topics and equitable task distribution, which fostered mutual engagement and a cohesive educational and research venture. Reported benefits from both bachelor’s and master’s level students include improved research competencies, enhanced technical support, improved time management and increased motivation. Supervisors observed gains in both the efficiency and effectiveness of the mentoring process. Research limitations/implications This study is conducted with a limited number of 14 participants. Practical implications The findings underscore the potential of MRM to tailor effective research mentoring approaches that cater to the diverse needs of students, suggesting practical strategies for its broader implementation. Social implications This inquiry not only contributes to the academic literature by detailing a novel application of CoP theory in educational settings but also provides actionable insights for enhancing the structure and outcome of research mentoring programs. Originality/value The study addresses gaps in traditional supervisory practices and contributes to the broader understanding of effective research mentoring strategies.