Genetic modulation of yield and phenotypic plasticity of yield in winter wheat

For winter wheat in the US Central Great Plains, phenotypic plasticity of yield is agronomically adaptive, i.e., genotypes with higher plasticity have higher yield in high yielding environments with no tradeoff in stressful, low yielding environments. Using data from variety trials conducted between 2000 and 2022 and cultivars released between 1991 and 2022, we explored time trends in phenotypic plasticity and heritability of yield. Given that yield plasticity is agronomically adaptive in the Great Plains, we hypothesize that i) newer cultivars will have higher yield plasticity; ii) heritability of yield is declining in the time series; and iii) genomic regions associated with yield depend on the environment and do not fully overlap with those associated with phenotypic plasticity of yield. Breeding for yield and agronomic adaptation increased phenotypic plasticity of yield at 0.5% year -1; broad sense heritability of yield decreased from 0.23 in 1993 to 0.15 in 2017. Genome-wide-association analysis shows genomic regions associated with yield varied between high yielding and stressful environments and were partially independent of those associated with yield plasticity. Newer cultivars have a higher frequency of alleles associated with yield and its plasticity. We discuss implications for breeding and agronomy aimed to improve wheat phenotypes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental Botany
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraf478
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genetic modulation of yield and phenotypic plasticity of yield in winter wheat

Nicolas Giordano, Jeffrey D. Boehm, Víctor O. Sadras, Romulo P. Lollato et al.
1 citations
Journal of Experimental Botany
Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
1.75
article

Genetic modulation of yield and phenotypic plasticity of yield in winter wheat

Nicolas Giordano, Jeffrey D. Boehm, Víctor O. Sadras, Romulo P. Lollato, Andrés Berger, Giovana Cruppe, Guihua Bai, Amanda de Oliveira Silva, Scott D. Haley, Pablo Eduardo Abbate, Paul St. Amand, Allan K. Fritz, Sally Jones‐Diamond, Mary J. Guttieri, Guorong Zhang, Jane Lingenfelser, Amy Bernardo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

For winter wheat in the US Central Great Plains, phenotypic plasticity of yield is agronomically adaptive, i.e., genotypes with higher plasticity have higher yield in high yielding environments with no tradeoff in stressful, low yielding environments. Using data from variety trials conducted between 2000 and 2022 and cultivars released between 1991 and 2022, we explored time trends in phenotypic plasticity and heritability of yield. Given that yield plasticity is agronomically adaptive in the Great Plains, we hypothesize that i) newer cultivars will have higher yield plasticity; ii) heritability of yield is declining in the time series; and iii) genomic regions associated with yield depend on the environment and do not fully overlap with those associated with phenotypic plasticity of yield. Breeding for yield and agronomic adaptation increased phenotypic plasticity of yield at 0.5% year -1; broad sense heritability of yield decreased from 0.23 in 1993 to 0.15 in 2017. Genome-wide-association analysis shows genomic regions associated with yield varied between high yielding and stressful environments and were partially independent of those associated with yield plasticity. Newer cultivars have a higher frequency of alleles associated with yield and its plasticity. We discuss implications for breeding and agronomy aimed to improve wheat phenotypes.

Journal of Experimental Botany
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), Oklahoma State University (US), Agricultural Research Service (US), Flinders University (AU), National University of Mar del Plata (AR), Kansas State University (US), South Australian Research and Development Institute (AU), Center for Grain and Animal Health Research (US), Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia (BR), Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (UY), National Agricultural Technology Institute (AR), Colorado State University (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Kansas Wheat Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.