Hypersensitivity Reaction to Detergents - A Myth or Reality?

Dear Editor, Contact allergic dermatitis (CAD) and urticaria are among the most common allergic diseases in dermatovenerology (1,2). In order to diagnose CAD, it is necessary to demonstrate contact sensitization through patch testing, the presence of dermatitis, and a clinically relevant exposure to a positive allergen (1). In comparison with CAD, acute urticaria most often do not require extensive diagnostic workup, unless food or drug hypersensitivity is suspected (2). Patients presenting at a hospital with eczema and/or hives often report that they have stopped using and or have experimented with numerous fabric softeners, shampoos, bath products, detergents, and foods, having been convinced that these are the triggers for their skin conditions. Although patients and even some physicians often suspect laundry detergents, studies have shown that only a very small percentage of cases is actually linked to these products. A study from 1992 found that 26% of 3 841 patients with skin changes believed that laundry detergent was the cause (3). Similarly, a 2002 study on 738 patients with a suspicion of CAD found that 10.7% believed detergent was the cause of their skin lesions (4) This opinion was shared by 2.3% of the physicians involved in the study (4). From 2012 to 2014, out of 26 062 cases linked to powder laundry detergent, 72.2% were diagnosed with CAD (5). Numerous cosmetics ingredients that can also be found in detergents are known to be possible triggers for hives (6). However, laundry products contain substances that can potentially cause skin reactions, such as surfactants, washing enhancers, bleaches, additives (fragrances, enzymes, dyes), and preservatives. A meta-analysis found that the most common allergens that tested positive in patch tests among the general population were nickel, chromium, and fragrances (1). Although less common, preservatives such as methylchloroisothiazolinone, methylisothiazolinone, and 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one (BIT) and fragrances used in laundry detergents have also been reported (1,7). However, just the presence of these allergens in products is in most cases not sufficient to identify them as causes of CAD (8). Their concentration in a product, the method of application, and the residue left on clothes after washing must also be considered. A patch test on 36 individuals previously sensitized to fragrance showed that only 2 had a mildly positive reaction, and only at concentrations 20 times higher than the fragrance residue on clothing after washing (8). Similarly, BIT concentration substantial enough to cause skin changes was not detected in laundry detergent (7). When examining actual exposure to enzymes in laundry detergents, Basketter et al. concluded that there was no risk of skin reactions, either irritant or allergic (9). Different types of textiles were washed using a standard procedure and then remained on patients for 48 hours in the form of a patch test (including patients with seborrheic dermatitis and young children). The results showed no visible reactions in any of the individuals (10). Belisto et al. conducted extensive testing on over 700 patients for more than two years (4). Patch testing was performed using detergents diluted to a 0.1% concentration in water, and patients who tested positive underwent further testing to compare reactions to liquid detergents and detergent granules, followed by a third phase where half of a 100% cotton T-shirt was washed with detergent and worn by patients for 12 hours a day over 14 days, after which the results were recorded (4). They concluded that the laundry detergent could have been the cause of CAD in less than 0.7% of patients (4). Although 1.3% had a positive reaction to chromium, 10.3% to nickel, and 18.4% to fragrance, none of these patients had a positive reaction to the detergent itself. Furthermore, among the participants there were 5 patients with atopic dermatitis who, despite having hypersensitive skin, did not develop CAD (4). Although many detergent ingredients are known to ben allergens, their residual concentration on machine-washed clothes is not clinically significant, even in individuals with very sensitive skin (4,11). However, if skin changes are confined to areas covered by clothing, particularly high-friction regions such as the axilla and groin, it is advisable to perform a patch test using a 0.1% aqueous solution of the detergent (4); but even in such cases, skin changes are more likely to result from substances present in the clothing material itself rather than from residual detergent (11).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2025-05-01
Primary Topic
Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hypersensitivity Reaction to Detergents - A Myth or Reality?

Suzana Ljubojević Hadžavdić, Daška Štulhofer Buzina, Erin Puch
PubMed
Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
article

Hypersensitivity Reaction to Detergents - A Myth or Reality?

Suzana Ljubojević Hadžavdić, Daška Štulhofer Buzina, Erin Puch
article en

Abstract

Dear Editor, Contact allergic dermatitis (CAD) and urticaria are among the most common allergic diseases in dermatovenerology (1,2). In order to diagnose CAD, it is necessary to demonstrate contact sensitization through patch testing, the presence of dermatitis, and a clinically relevant exposure to a positive allergen (1). In comparison with CAD, acute urticaria most often do not require extensive diagnostic workup, unless food or drug hypersensitivity is suspected (2). Patients presenting at a hospital with eczema and/or hives often report that they have stopped using and or have experimented with numerous fabric softeners, shampoos, bath products, detergents, and foods, having been convinced that these are the triggers for their skin conditions. Although patients and even some physicians often suspect laundry detergents, studies have shown that only a very small percentage of cases is actually linked to these products. A study from 1992 found that 26% of 3 841 patients with skin changes believed that laundry detergent was the cause (3). Similarly, a 2002 study on 738 patients with a suspicion of CAD found that 10.7% believed detergent was the cause of their skin lesions (4) This opinion was shared by 2.3% of the physicians involved in the study (4). From 2012 to 2014, out of 26 062 cases linked to powder laundry detergent, 72.2% were diagnosed with CAD (5). Numerous cosmetics ingredients that can also be found in detergents are known to be possible triggers for hives (6). However, laundry products contain substances that can potentially cause skin reactions, such as surfactants, washing enhancers, bleaches, additives (fragrances, enzymes, dyes), and preservatives. A meta-analysis found that the most common allergens that tested positive in patch tests among the general population were nickel, chromium, and fragrances (1). Although less common, preservatives such as methylchloroisothiazolinone, methylisothiazolinone, and 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one (BIT) and fragrances used in laundry detergents have also been reported (1,7). However, just the presence of these allergens in products is in most cases not sufficient to identify them as causes of CAD (8). Their concentration in a product, the method of application, and the residue left on clothes after washing must also be considered. A patch test on 36 individuals previously sensitized to fragrance showed that only 2 had a mildly positive reaction, and only at concentrations 20 times higher than the fragrance residue on clothing after washing (8). Similarly, BIT concentration substantial enough to cause skin changes was not detected in laundry detergent (7). When examining actual exposure to enzymes in laundry detergents, Basketter et al. concluded that there was no risk of skin reactions, either irritant or allergic (9). Different types of textiles were washed using a standard procedure and then remained on patients for 48 hours in the form of a patch test (including patients with seborrheic dermatitis and young children). The results showed no visible reactions in any of the individuals (10). Belisto et al. conducted extensive testing on over 700 patients for more than two years (4). Patch testing was performed using detergents diluted to a 0.1% concentration in water, and patients who tested positive underwent further testing to compare reactions to liquid detergents and detergent granules, followed by a third phase where half of a 100% cotton T-shirt was washed with detergent and worn by patients for 12 hours a day over 14 days, after which the results were recorded (4). They concluded that the laundry detergent could have been the cause of CAD in less than 0.7% of patients (4). Although 1.3% had a positive reaction to chromium, 10.3% to nickel, and 18.4% to fragrance, none of these patients had a positive reaction to the detergent itself. Furthermore, among the participants there were 5 patients with atopic dermatitis who, despite having hypersensitive skin, did not develop CAD (4). Although many detergent ingredients are known to ben allergens, their residual concentration on machine-washed clothes is not clinically significant, even in individuals with very sensitive skin (4,11). However, if skin changes are confined to areas covered by clothing, particularly high-friction regions such as the axilla and groin, it is advisable to perform a patch test using a 0.1% aqueous solution of the detergent (4); but even in such cases, skin changes are more likely to result from substances present in the clothing material itself rather than from residual detergent (11).

PubMedVol. 33(1)
University Hospital Centre Zagreb (HR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.