A Systematic Review of Retrospective Evidence on Patient and Surgical Factors in Recurrent Cubital Tunnel Syndrome.
The retrospective nature and limited power of included studies increase risk of selection and Type II errors. Regardless, there seems to be no significant difference in recurrence/revision rates based on surgical techniques. CuTR was often recommended as an initial procedure while ulnar nerve transposition (UNT) was reserved for revisions or patients with nerve subluxation.
Authors
- Alex Gu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4814-0796)
- Asif M. Ilyas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5636-9873)
- Jack Flynn (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3092-4266)
- Mohammad Khak (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9952-3121)
- Pranav Bingi
- Jordan Ginder
Institutions
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (US)
- Rothman Institute (US)
- Drexel University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- PubMed
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.22038/abjs.2025.89107.4040
- Primary Topic
- Peripheral Nerve Disorders
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00